nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other drugs.Some people argue that this should be banned because it is morally wrong while others are in favour of them.Discuss both views and give your openion.
Experimental use of animals is a controversial issue over last few decades, though it has a vital role in many scientific breakthroughs of past and present century. however, both animal-right extremists and anti-vivisectionist groups believe that animal researches are both cruel and unnecessary, regardless of the purpose or benefit. Let us discuss both aspects of laboratory use of living organisms.
Scientists denote that animal testing in bio-medical sector is highly pertinent as it serves the purpose of human tests. Furthermore, we share 95% of our genes with a mouse, making them an effective model for human body. Through many experiments they also prove that all animals are very similar to each other in organ systems and diseases to it. Inevitability of the pharmaceutical use of animals is exemplified by the inventions of cancer cure drugs, asthma inhalers and modern vaccines for polio, TB and meningitis. Moreover, the proponents argue that sacrifice of an organism for the benefits if other is always justified in an ecosystem. The above facts necessitates animal use of research program.
Conversely, naturalists proclaim that rather than cruel animal experiments are unreliable and even dangerous. Their first argument is that the basic moral right of a living creature is not respected, but reduced t mere tools in science laboratories. Next, the pain and suffering that the animals subjected to is immense. Last,but very important reason of the opponents is that despite the similarities between mankind and some animals, there are significant differences that can not be ignored. so complicated human diseases may not be complex for other animals. For example, only one third of human cancer causing substances are harmful for other living beings. In addition, the statics prove that 90% of live tests fail in human trials. All these points belittle the importance of animal tests.
To conclude, controlled and minimal live researches can be allowed under strict legislation considering the medical advancements and alternatives to animal tests are to be encouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h it has a vital role in many scientific breakthroughs of past and present centur...
^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...akthroughs of past and present century. however, both animal-right extremists and anti-...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'necessitate'.
Suggestion: necessitate
...tified in an ecosystem. The above facts necessitates animal use of research program. Conv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...he animals subjected to is immense. Last,but very important reason of the opponents ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...nt differences that can not be ignored. so complicated human diseases may not be c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, third, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43865030675 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09777225303 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5388711128 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1929359992 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570595457236 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256477880215 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11256926025 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211406121542 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.