The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
"Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument states the difference in results of observation centered method and interview centered method carried by Dr.Field and Dr.Karp respectively on children of Tertia. To support this claim of both methods the author gives the concluded results.The argument may seems logical at first glance but it depends on unsubstantial assumption and lack of persuasive evidence.
First of all, the author was unable to state the condition in which both methods were tested on children.It may be possible that children were in different state of mind in both methods.It also be possible that results of both methods may have been differ because the the methods have tested on different children.
Secondly the author was unable to state the bases of both the methods have tested.It may be possible that Dr.Field has experimented on children age group of 10-15 years and Dr.Karp on children age group of 15-18 years.In this case the results of both methods could have being different.
Lastly,the author should give more statistical and logical data to buttress the claims.In conclusion, the argument lack in persuasive evidences to support the claims which may have reverted by making it buttressed by logical and figurative data.
Completed in 23 minutes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and interview centered method carried by Dr.Field and Dr.Karp respectively on chi...
^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
...nterview centered method carried by Dr.Field and Dr.Karp respectively on children of...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...ered method carried by Dr.Field and Dr.Karp respectively on children of Tertia. To ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... the author gives the concluded results.The argument may seems logical at first gla...
^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ch both methods were tested on children.It may be possible that children were in d...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...different state of mind in both methods.It also be possible that results of both m...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...t state of mind in both methods.It also be possible that results of both methods m...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differed'.
Suggestion: differed
...t results of both methods may have been differ because the the methods have tested on ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...th methods may have been differ because the the methods have tested on different childr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...th methods may have been differ because the the methods have tested on different childr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...e bases of both the methods have tested.It may be possible that Dr.Field has exper...
^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
... have tested.It may be possible that Dr.Field has experimented on children age group ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...hildren age group of 10-15 years and Dr.Karp on children age group of 15-18 years.In...
^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...rp on children age group of 15-18 years.In this case the results of both methods c...
^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ds could have being different. Lastly,the author should give more statistical and...
^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...and logical data to buttress the claims.In conclusion, the argument lack in persua...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'lastly', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.291866028708 0.25644967241 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.167464114833 0.15541462614 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0909090909091 0.0836205057962 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0287081339713 0.0520304965353 55% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00956937799043 0.0272364105082 35% => OK
Prepositions: 0.148325358852 0.125424944231 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0622009569378 0.0416121511921 149% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73125886726 2.79052419416 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0239234449761 0.026700313972 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.114832535885 0.113004496875 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0334928229665 0.0255425247493 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00956937799043 0.0127820249294 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1259.0 2731.13054187 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 200.0 446.07635468 45% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.295 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.57801047555 82% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.415 0.378187486979 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.335 0.287650121315 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.23 0.208842608468 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14 0.135150697306 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73125886726 2.79052419416 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 207.018472906 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495 0.469332199767 105% => OK
Word variations: 42.5148911465 52.1807786196 81% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 20.039408867 30% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 33.3333333333 23.2022227129 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.936821097 57.7814097925 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 209.833333333 141.986410481 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 23.2022227129 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 0.724660767414 253% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 3.58251231527 447% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 66.8333333333 51.9672348444 129% => OK
Elegance: 2.44186046512 1.8405768891 133% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283942712283 0.441005458295 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.26493132258 0.135418324435 196% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.177049680388 0.0829849096947 213% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.918331014188 0.58762219726 156% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115498204608 0.147661913831 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173634281145 0.193483328276 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070242901231 0.0970749176394 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.306856153306 0.42659136922 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.194151909446 0.0774707102158 251% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177896090478 0.312017818177 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626901336075 0.0698173142475 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.33743842365 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 6.46551724138 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 14.657635468 34% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.