The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
"Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The arguments states the observation and research of Dr.Field and Dr.Karp on children in Tertia. It argument concludes that the research of Dr.Karp proves the conclusion Of Dr.Field invalid and thus the observation centered approach is invalid too.The evidence cited to support this argument are information of past observation of Dr.Field,recent interviews of children of Tertia and interview centered approach of team of Dr.Karp. However,the the premises are unable to justify or strengthen the argument.The main reason why the argument is rendered inconclusive are fallacious assumptions,ignorance of research conducted.
Firstly,the argument incorrectly assumes the conditions in which the observation and research work is carried out.It may be possible that the economical condition of parents of children may be bad, so to support them whole village look after there child. Also, it can be the case of orphan child, which is interviewed and observed.Hence,the argument is based on faulty assumptions and not logically strong
Secondly,the argument fails to consider the factors that can affect the outcome of the argument in different way.For instance, it may be possible that the child which is interviewed have been asked more question about other people of village rather then their parents.Hence, the argument remain cognizant from these factors and thus weak.
Lastly, the argument falsely assumes that the team of graduate students of Dr.Karp using interview centered method will collect accurate data of child-rearing traditions.It may be possible that bases on conditions on which interview centered method will not be available everywhere. In that case,results will ambiguous.
Hence,the argument primary conclusion that observation centered method is invalid and less efficient then interview centered method.The main reason why the argument seems illogical it includes the incorrect assumptions. The argument can be strengthen by considering important factors and using persuasive information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'state'.
Suggestion: state
The arguments states the observation and research of Dr.Fiel...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
...ates the observation and research of Dr.Field and Dr.Karp on children in Tertia. It a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...rvation and research of Dr.Field and Dr.Karp on children in Tertia. It argument conc...
^^^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...ument concludes that the research of Dr.Karp proves the conclusion Of Dr.Field inval...
^^^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
... of Dr.Karp proves the conclusion Of Dr.Field invalid and thus the observation center...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...vation centered approach is invalid too.The evidence cited to support this argument...
^^^
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
...e information of past observation of Dr.Field,recent interviews of children of Terti...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , recent
...ormation of past observation of Dr.Field,recent interviews of children of Tertia and i...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bservation of Dr.Field,recent interviews of children of Tertia and interview cent...
^^
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...terview centered approach of team of Dr.Karp. However,the the premises are unable to...
^^^^
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...red approach of team of Dr.Karp. However,the the premises are unable to justify or s...
^^^^
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ed approach of team of Dr.Karp. However,the the premises are unable to justify or stren...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ed approach of team of Dr.Karp. However,the the premises are unable to justify or stren...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 508, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e to justify or strengthen the argument.The main reason why the argument is rendere...
^^^
Line 1, column 592, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ignorance
... inconclusive are fallacious assumptions,ignorance of research conducted. Firstly,the a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...orance of research conducted. Firstly,the argument incorrectly assumes the condit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...vation and research work is carried out.It may be possible that the economical con...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...hild, which is interviewed and observed.Hence,the argument is based on faulty assumpt...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... which is interviewed and observed.Hence,the argument is based on faulty assumptions...
^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ons and not logically strong Secondly,the argument fails to consider the factors ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...utcome of the argument in different way.For instance, it may be possible that the c...
^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...on about other people of village rather then their parents.Hence, the argument remai...
^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...le of village rather then their parents.Hence, the argument remain cognizant from the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...hat the team of graduate students of Dr.Karp using interview centered method will co...
^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...curate data of child-rearing traditions.It may be possible that bases on condition...
^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , results
...ot be available everywhere. In that case,results will ambiguous. Hence,the argument p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...at case,results will ambiguous. Hence,the argument primary conclusion that observ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ed method is invalid and less efficient then interview centered method.The main reas...
^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...fficient then interview centered method.The main reason why the argument seems illo...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.270769230769 0.25644967241 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.172307692308 0.15541462614 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104615384615 0.0836205057962 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0553846153846 0.0520304965353 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0184615384615 0.0272364105082 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110769230769 0.125424944231 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0369230769231 0.0416121511921 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.24936051334 2.79052419416 116% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0123076923077 0.026700313972 46% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0923076923077 0.113004496875 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0307692307692 0.0255425247493 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0246153846154 0.0127820249294 193% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2019.0 2731.13054187 74% => OK
No of words: 294.0 446.07635468 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.86734693878 6.12365571057 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.57801047555 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.486394557823 0.378187486979 129% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.421768707483 0.287650121315 147% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.333333333333 0.208842608468 160% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.190476190476 0.135150697306 141% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24936051334 2.79052419416 116% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 207.018472906 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506802721088 0.469332199767 108% => OK
Word variations: 50.3184514694 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 20.039408867 45% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 32.6666666667 23.2022227129 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 132.228011078 57.7814097925 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 224.333333333 141.986410481 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 23.2022227129 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 0.724660767414 230% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 29.0 3.58251231527 809% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 74.843537415 51.9672348444 144% => OK
Elegance: 1.7 1.8405768891 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267968630862 0.441005458295 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.241171331985 0.135418324435 178% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.151387606552 0.0829849096947 182% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.748385222968 0.58762219726 127% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.192041218576 0.147661913831 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160911049948 0.193483328276 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805621128045 0.0970749176394 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.377302092872 0.42659136922 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.11491987776 0.0774707102158 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176042436802 0.312017818177 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595770858837 0.0698173142475 85% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.33743842365 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 6.46551724138 15% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 14.657635468 55% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.