An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
The arguer asserts that the people of Tagus lack vitamin A. Although, the seeds of this millet are costly the farmers would be paid subsidies, and therefore the arguer has further asserted that the government should do everything to promote this new type. However, there are certain points that question the soundness of the recommendation made by the arguer and relies on the assumptions and is therefore, weak and unconvincing.
Firstly, the arguer states that the nation of Tagus is impoverished and has vitamin A deficiency among its people and so a new breed of millet with high content is developed. But, he doesn't provide the statistics about the number of people who lack vitamin A. Additionally, the arguer doesn't provide the cost of the millet which is being developed and as he states that it is impoverished nation would the people be able to afford the new millet breed. Moreover, he doesn't provide the various benefits that would be there for the people who would have it. The arguer also doesn't provide the distinction between the new breed of millet and the old one. He should have bolstered the argument by providing the cost of the new and old millet, contents of both and the percent increase in vitamin A when they are eaten.
Secondly, the arguer states that the new type of millet cost more so, it could be possible that the farmers won't be able to afford them. The question which arises is how much time would it take for the growth of new millet? What are the favorable conditions for its proper growth? Even though, the arguer states that farmers would be paid subsidies for farming the new variety but doesn't provide the amount they would be paid. However, it is also stated that millet is staple food in Tagus and people would readily adopt to the new variety but doesn't provide evidence on it. How could the arguer state that the people would adopt to new variety? Nevertheless, it may happen that people don't like the new breed of millet as it is costly and insipid. In addition, the arguer also asserts that the government should do everything to promote this new type of millet to combat with vitamin A deficiency. Admittedly, he should have provided the measures and actions which are to be undertaken for the promotion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a new breed of millet with high content is developed. But, he doesnt provide the...
^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ith high content is developed. But, he doesnt provide the statistics about the number...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ack vitamin A. Additionally, the arguer doesnt provide the cost of the millet which is...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ford the new millet breed. Moreover, he doesnt provide the various benefits that would...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ople who would have it. The arguer also doesnt provide the distinction between the new...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...bsidies for farming the new variety but doesnt provide the amount they would be paid. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
... food in Tagus and people would readily adopt to the new variety but doesnt provide evid...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ld readily adopt to the new variety but doesnt provide evidence on it. How could the a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
... the arguer state that the people would adopt to new variety? Nevertheless, it may happe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 688, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...Nevertheless, it may happen that people dont like the new breed of millet as it is c...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223004694836 0.25644967241 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.171361502347 0.15541462614 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0774647887324 0.0836205057962 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0446009389671 0.0520304965353 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0422535211268 0.0272364105082 155% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115023474178 0.125424944231 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0399061032864 0.0416121511921 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46082160326 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.018779342723 0.026700313972 70% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.12441314554 0.113004496875 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.037558685446 0.0255425247493 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0258215962441 0.0127820249294 202% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2260.0 2731.13054187 83% => OK
No of words: 393.0 446.07635468 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75063613232 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361323155216 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.208651399491 0.287650121315 73% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.124681933842 0.208842608468 60% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0839694656489 0.135150697306 62% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46082160326 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 207.018472906 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396946564885 0.469332199767 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.5389229298 52.1807786196 80% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1176470588 23.2022227129 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7347172584 57.7814097925 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.941176471 141.986410481 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 23.2022227129 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.724660767414 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.14285714286 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 3.58251231527 279% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 43.9827870079 51.9672348444 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.46363636364 1.8405768891 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374532410881 0.441005458295 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.200890373036 0.135418324435 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0999017642476 0.0829849096947 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.625440103394 0.58762219726 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142810831734 0.147661913831 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18950747156 0.193483328276 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898247499205 0.0970749176394 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.702389649822 0.42659136922 165% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0403990620503 0.0774707102158 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309841231343 0.312017818177 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524495226503 0.0698173142475 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.87684729064 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 5.36822660099 205% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.