Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected.However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Here, the author is suggesting that inoculations against cow flu should not be routinely administered because the small probability of a person dying as a result of inoculations. Even though these inoculations could save many lives. I find these conclusion made by the author disagreeable and based on too many assumptions. The author is presenting a statement without any precise to bolster the claim.
First of all, these inoculations are plausible solutions for saving many lives from the cow flu: a deadly virus. It is of apex importance to eradicate such disease and to provide protection from it. The author mentions that the disease was prevailing in some areas. Thus, there is a high possibility that this disease could be transmitted through air contamination and could spread to other areas affecting more people. To obscure the use of inoculations would be similar to endangering many more lives.
Secondly, the author claims that there is a small possibility of people dying from these inoculations. This argument is based on presumption without any definite proof. The author doesn't mention whether there were actual tests conducted to conclude that the inoculations were virulent to the people. Also, if anyone died while they were vaccinated, it does not imply that the medicine was the primary cause of the death. The person may be dying because some other cause which doctors failed to diagnose.
Also to further support my stand, I would like to add that there are many other inoculations carried out against polio, plague, small pox, etc. These inoculations are also known to have a small fatality rate by injection. But that never stops the parent to vaccinate the child with the dose. No treatment known to mankind has a hundred percent efficiency and yet it is used by people to prevent the greater evil of the disease.
To sum up, it is extremely important to permit routine administration of the inoculations against cow flu. Just because there is a small possibility of fatality without any firm evidence to bolster the claim, it doesn't mean that protection of the masses from deadly diseases is secondary. Prevention is better than cure. Thus in the same way preventing the spreading of such diseases from one area to another rather than disabusing the situation later will be more efficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Here, the author is suggesting that inoc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rson dying as a result of inoculations. Even though these inoculations could save many live...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this conclusion' or 'these conclusions'?
Suggestion: this conclusion; these conclusions
...culations could save many lives. I find these conclusion made by the author disagreeable and bas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hout any precise to bolster the claim. First of all, these inoculations are pla...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...milar to endangering many more lives. Secondly, the author claims that there i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... without any definite proof. The author doesnt mention whether there were actual tests...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause which doctors failed to diagnose. Also to further support my stand, I woul...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...h doctors failed to diagnose. Also to further support my stand, I would li...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...event the greater evil of the disease. To sum up, it is extremely important to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... firm evidence to bolster the claim, it doesnt mean that protection of the masses from...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ondary. Prevention is better than cure. Thus in the same way preventing the spreadin...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up', 'in the same way']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232057416268 0.25644967241 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.179425837321 0.15541462614 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0837320574163 0.0836205057962 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0502392344498 0.0520304965353 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0239234449761 0.0272364105082 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122009569378 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0502392344498 0.0416121511921 121% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81187589226 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0454545454545 0.026700313972 170% => OK
Particles: 0.00478468899522 0.001811407834 264% => OK
Determiners: 0.124401913876 0.113004496875 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0191387559809 0.0255425247493 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00239234449761 0.0127820249294 19% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2366.0 2731.13054187 87% => OK
No of words: 383.0 446.07635468 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17754569191 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360313315927 0.378187486979 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261096605744 0.287650121315 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.167101827676 0.208842608468 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135770234987 0.135150697306 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81187589226 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 207.018472906 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535248041775 0.469332199767 114% => OK
Word variations: 59.528826429 52.1807786196 114% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.039408867 110% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4090909091 23.2022227129 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7709029692 57.7814097925 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 141.986410481 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4090909091 23.2022227129 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.724660767414 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 3.58251231527 307% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 43.5187514835 51.9672348444 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.59433962264 1.8405768891 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506535360034 0.441005458295 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0927893553743 0.135418324435 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0533758780525 0.0829849096947 64% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.496508968657 0.58762219726 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129982522734 0.147661913831 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17723816543 0.193483328276 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838574072427 0.0970749176394 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.379915951748 0.42659136922 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0121100543081 0.0774707102158 16% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337958262347 0.312017818177 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041543535602 0.0698173142475 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.87684729064 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.