"Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels."
According to argument, number of shoppers in Central Plaza decreased due to increased popularity of skateboarding in the Plaza. Which also increased liter and vending in plaza. Thus, it is recommended that if city will prohibit skateboarding in plaza, it will return business to its previous high levels. This argument has certain loop holes. There is no evidence presented to relate increase in skateboarding with decrease in business, how shoppers are getting effected by skateboarding, how business will be back to high levels by prohibiting skateboarding in plaza.
First assumption in this argument is that shoppers are not able to shop because of increased skateboarders in the Central Plaza. There could be a possibility that shoppers doesn’t want to shop in the Plaza, there may be new Plaza opened in the city which have new shops and shoppers are shopping in the new plaza. There might be economic crisis in the city, and shoppers doesn’t want to shop much.
Second assumption is that decrease in business is only because of skateboarders. It is not mentioned in the argument that weather business is trying their best to attract the customers. There could be possibility that customer of plaza business is not good or there is no new designs are coming in the shops and customers are getting bored of seeing same type designs and styles and they don’t want to shop more in the plaza.
There is also a assumption that if city will prohibit skateboarders in the Central Plaza that will increase the business. There might be a possibility that some young shopper come for shopping using skateboards. If skateboarding stopped in the plaza, business might lose those shoppers. It is assumed that only Skateboarders have increased litter and vandalism throughout the Plaza. There might be possibility that before litter was there in the plaza also, but with the skateboarders its getting spread. Which infers that skateboarders may not be sole responsible for increasing litter.
As there are above weaknesses in the argument, it can’t be concluded that prohibiting skateboarding will give business hikes. More surveys and analysis is needed find the reasons why there are less shoppers in the Plaza.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere could be a possibility that shoppers doesn't want to shop in the Plaza, ...
^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
... in the shops and customers are getting bored of seeing same type designs and styles and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...op more in the plaza. There is also a assumption that if city will prohibit s...
^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the Central Plaza that will increase the business. There might be a possibili...
^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...Plaza that will increase the business. There might be a possibility that some young ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun shoppers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s needed find the reasons why there are less shoppers in the Plaza.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23645320197 0.25644967241 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.216748768473 0.15541462614 139% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0665024630542 0.0836205057962 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0344827586207 0.0520304965353 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0221674876847 0.0272364105082 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135467980296 0.125424944231 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0714285714286 0.0416121511921 172% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96671891259 2.79052419416 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246305418719 0.026700313972 92% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0689655172414 0.113004496875 61% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0369458128079 0.0255425247493 145% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.012315270936 0.0127820249294 96% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2240.0 2731.13054187 82% => OK
No of words: 361.0 446.07635468 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20498614958 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365650969529 0.378187486979 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285318559557 0.287650121315 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224376731302 0.208842608468 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138504155125 0.135150697306 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96671891259 2.79052419416 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 207.018472906 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412742382271 0.469332199767 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.0639644157 52.1807786196 81% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3167425519 57.7814097925 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.894736842 141.986410481 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.421052631579 0.724660767414 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 47.5318559557 51.9672348444 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.62162162162 1.8405768891 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49338088984 0.441005458295 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129206946765 0.135418324435 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106083097314 0.0829849096947 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.581860197674 0.58762219726 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.179959631763 0.147661913831 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217328301269 0.193483328276 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12044299978 0.0970749176394 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.432274932524 0.42659136922 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0492637713571 0.0774707102158 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352535482073 0.312017818177 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350586386739 0.0698173142475 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.