The manager's advice for WWAC radio station to switch from rock-music format to news and talk programs to gain more audiences seems quite reasonable and effective at first glance, but actially, more evidences are needed to fully evaluate the validation of the argument.
To begin with, the author contends that the radio station witnessed a decline in the number of listeners inspite of the population growth in the listening area, and thus proposed attracting newly moved in residents are of vital importance. However, this argument is not strong enough as we do not know how many retired people actually moved in and is the number larger or smaller than audiences WWAC lost. More specific figures are needed to evaluate this suggestion. For example, if only a small number of people moved in compared to the great decline in audience number, it would be ineffective to change program type to save WWAC radio station.
Secondly, the manager bridged a drop in sales of recorded music with the declined interest in music as a whole, which is absolutely not convincing. With the rapid and swift advancement of technology, more and more various formats of music are provided for people. For instances, many music lovers prefer to download music from the Internet instead of buying a recorded CD. Based on this, maybe a survey about residents' fond of music would better weaken or strengthen this argument, but currently, the connection is too weak.
Last but not least, more evidence should be provided to support that news and talk program is indeed more popular that music format. Maybe it is better than rock-music format, but no investigation is provided to assess if other types of music, like Jazz or Classical music, is also not welcomed. So the managers' advice of changing from music type program to talk format may not be as useful as it was thought.
In conclusion, depending on the evidence we find to fill out, we may discover if the manager of WWAC radio station presented convicing and effective suggestions in the article, or if another decision should be made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
The managers advice for WWAC radio station to switch...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...e this suggestion. For example, if only a small number of people moved in compared to the great d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
...cal music, is also not welcomed. So the managers advice of changing from music type prog...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 349.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97134670487 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59493833796 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530085959885 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.803792034 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.461538462 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 23.324526521 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 5.70786347227 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198777510797 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717951950579 0.0743258471296 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520146113907 0.0701772020484 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997747321659 0.128457276422 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529574538739 0.0628817314937 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.3799401198 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 98.500998004 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.