Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. Recently another anthropologist, Dr. Karp, visited the group of islands that includes Tertia and used the interview-centered method to study child-rearing practices. In the interviews that Dr. Karp conducted with children living in this group of islands, the children spent much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. Dr. Karp decided that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture must be invalid. Some anthropologists recommend that to obtain accurate information on Tertian child-rearing practices, future research on the subject should be conducted via the interview-centered method.
The author's proposal that the observation centred approach is invalid and interview-centred method will be much more accurate is debatable. According to the article the observations made by Dr.field states that the children from Tertia were reared by the entire village rather than their biological parents. This statement didn't include any details about the children's perspective of their biological parents or their tradition. Thus leaving more room for further inquisition regarding the culture in Tertia.
However with the evident fact that the observations weren't focusing on children's perspective of the cultural upbringing, Dr.Karp strongly disagrees with the statement that is not included in his peer's research.
Dr. Karp has also stated that children spend much more time thinking about their biological parents. This doesn't necessarily defy the fact supporting the former research about the upbringing of the children by the entire village. Thus, Dr. Karp's statements leaves an ambiguous space about what he is exactly disagreeing with his peer.
From his interview perspective, Dr. Karp has only recorded the views of the children but has failed to record the actual cultural practices in Tertia from outside. This strongly suggests that one cannot completely dispose the observation-centred approach of anthropology.
Also, The fact that the author has discarded a famous approach of study based on one case study from a research that is 2 decades old is highly arguable. There are numerous factors that can contribute to the cultural practices. Adopting to only one kind of approach based on weak facts is naive and unwelcoming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
The authors proposal that the observation centred a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...heir biological parents. This statement didnt include any details about the childrens...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ion regarding the culture in Tertia. However with the evident fact that the observat...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... the evident fact that the observations werent focusing on childrens perspective of th...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...spective of the cultural upbringing, Dr.Karp strongly disagrees with the statement t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng about their biological parents. This doesnt necessarily defy the fact supporting th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...leaves an ambiguous space about what he is exactly disagreeing with his peer. From his interview per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...h of study based on one case study from a research that is 2 decades old is highly arguabl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'regarding', 'so', 'thus', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264705882353 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.154411764706 0.15541462614 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106617647059 0.0836205057962 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0661764705882 0.0520304965353 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0294117647059 0.0272364105082 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128676470588 0.125424944231 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0625 0.0416121511921 150% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93963752577 2.79052419416 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0147058823529 0.026700313972 55% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.113970588235 0.113004496875 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0110294117647 0.0255425247493 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0147058823529 0.0127820249294 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1649.0 2731.13054187 60% => OK
No of words: 254.0 446.07635468 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.49212598425 6.12365571057 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.57801047555 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417322834646 0.378187486979 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.338582677165 0.287650121315 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263779527559 0.208842608468 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149606299213 0.135150697306 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93963752577 2.79052419416 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 207.018472906 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590551181102 0.469332199767 126% => OK
Word variations: 60.9422959079 52.1807786196 117% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5384615385 23.2022227129 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4870684499 57.7814097925 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 141.986410481 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 23.2022227129 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.538461538462 0.724660767414 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.58251231527 223% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 53.396729255 51.9672348444 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.82352941176 1.8405768891 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32313126743 0.441005458295 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0801785196501 0.135418324435 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0458399501001 0.0829849096947 55% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.585331581534 0.58762219726 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176062457393 0.147661913831 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129449568235 0.193483328276 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847040432762 0.0970749176394 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.336526175717 0.42659136922 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0282119887198 0.0774707102158 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199976128389 0.312017818177 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592301497191 0.0698173142475 85% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.33743842365 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.