Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
With the information provided, the assumptions leading to conclusion remains unfounded. This argument is well presented yet fat-fetched. This claims that Woven baskets is highly famous in village of Palea. Indeed this basket has built there. However, archaeologists discovered it in Lithos recently. Hence this conclusion is ill-founded.
The primary assumption underlying the author of the conclusion that there is a deep river vicinity which it is considerably broad. As a matter of fact, there is a one approach for passing this river through the boat, while no Palean boats have been found. Nevertheless, he fails to preclude other possibility reason into account that it might be possible that situation of river has changed during the time due to the fact that every geological phenomena such as river, mountain, and so forth has changed. Want of such prudent answers makes the author assumption full of holes. Indeed river become shallow and narrow compared to the past. So, to reinforce the argument the author should have discussed about information about attribute of river in the current era.
Furthermore, the author of the assumptions avers that there is not any boat there. However, he fails to take other possibility that perhaps a boat has made. It has eroded during the time. So, to reinforce the argument the author should have discussed about some boats which it has vanished during the time.
Moreover, the author of the assumptions assumes that Palean baskets were not particularly Palean. Without considering and ruling other possible reason into account that it might be other manners for transferring basket such as trade which was considerably popular in the past era. In fact, some merchant transfer this goods from place to place. As we know that marriage and hostage can be other reason for this event. By considering this fact, moving and migration of resident of Palean might lead to this event and so forth.
In short, as discussed, the lack of assumption the several vital evidence enumerated above. The conclusion cannot be tenable. The author should have discussed about detail of river in the contemporary, other boats in surrounding setting, moving dweller that is greatly indispensable for finding basket there. On the other hand to make a rigid conclusion is very myopic observation method. After all, feckless attempts with a fallible method could not be a fool's errand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...s is highly famous in village of Palea. Indeed this basket has built there. However, a...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...gists discovered it in Lithos recently. Hence this conclusion is ill-founded. The pr...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...es the author assumption full of holes. Indeed river become shallow and narrow compare...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...st era. In fact, some merchant transfer this goods from place to place. As we know t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fools'' or 'fool's'?
Suggestion: fools'; fool's
...s with a fallible method could not be a fools errand.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, after all, in fact, in short, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 2260.96107784 90% => OK
No of words: 390.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19487179487 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73103285113 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 19.7664670659 132% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4474065577 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9230769231 119.503703932 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 23.324526521 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.70786347227 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.67664670659 299% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113212824982 0.218282227539 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330910878411 0.0743258471296 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484808246045 0.0701772020484 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632242295367 0.128457276422 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185102710236 0.0628817314937 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.3799401198 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.