Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
The argument concludes without substantial evidence, that the Palean baskets are uniquely Palean. Some arguments such as baskets being endemic to Palea are in favor of the conclusion. However, there are more opposing arguments such as no boats being found across the Brim river and archaeologists discovering "Palean" baskets in Lithos.
The following paragraphs present evidence, if provided, would weaken the argument and assert that baskets are unique to Palea.
The first argument states that archaeologists found one such Palean basket in Lithos. This argument is not a statistically sufficient sample. It is crucial to determine if more such baskets are present in Lithos. Given that there is only one such finding, it follows that such baskets are unique to Palea and could be not manufactured in the surrounding villages such as Lithos.
Additional evidence is needed which states whether such baskets are present in villages surrounding Palea, apart from Lithos. Such villages where Palean baskets can be discovered, may or may not exist. Non existence would further weaken the statement that the baskets are not unique to Palea.
Furthermore, the possibility of other villages building their own versions of baskets that suit a specific village's conditions needs to established. With this evidence, it follows that there might not have been a need to use Palean baskets and leads us to the possibility that Palean baskets might have been used only in Palea and not elsewhere.
The following paragraphs present evidence, if warranted, would strengthen the argument that the baskets are not unique to Palea.
It has to established if remains of boats are present across the river bed. It could be possible that in an unfortunate event, such as a flood, the boats might have been carried away and destroyed by the floods. The presence of boats indicates that Palean inmates were able to carry their baskets and introduce them to surrounding villages - hence strengthening the argument that they are not unique to Palea and thus substantiating the archaeologists' findings in Lithos.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'village'?
Suggestion: village
...ersions of baskets that suit a specific villages conditions needs to established. With t...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'apart from', 'as to', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256756756757 0.25644967241 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.172972972973 0.15541462614 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0972972972973 0.0836205057962 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0486486486486 0.0520304965353 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.027027027027 0.0272364105082 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110810810811 0.125424944231 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0621621621622 0.0416121511921 149% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89914525455 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0351351351351 0.026700313972 132% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0810810810811 0.113004496875 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0297297297297 0.0255425247493 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00810810810811 0.0127820249294 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2113.0 2731.13054187 77% => OK
No of words: 334.0 446.07635468 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32634730539 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.57801047555 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.398203592814 0.378187486979 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317365269461 0.287650121315 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203592814371 0.208842608468 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134730538922 0.135150697306 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89914525455 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 207.018472906 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428143712575 0.469332199767 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.6480519753 52.1807786196 82% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6470588235 23.2022227129 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5347163533 57.7814097925 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.294117647 141.986410481 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 23.2022227129 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.724660767414 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.14285714286 136% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 51.3835857696 51.9672348444 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.72826086957 1.8405768891 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340448205553 0.441005458295 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.138496589112 0.135418324435 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0786064791189 0.0829849096947 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.647448826432 0.58762219726 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.179308426854 0.147661913831 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149012723178 0.193483328276 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761169044877 0.0970749176394 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.328582420905 0.42659136922 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0747295958193 0.0774707102158 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218576016166 0.312017818177 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705246904343 0.0698173142475 101% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.33743842365 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.82512315271 166% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 6.46551724138 15% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.82389162562 212% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.