Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument holds true for the part to believe that Palean baskets were not authentically Palean as it was found at another place as well.From all the time, be it ancient or modern the cultures across the villages nearby same river were almost similar. If research would have followed then there was a chance that it was also found in any other village apart from these two. Maybe the pattern was followed from some other place city or town to these villages.
But at the same time even this is possible that people used to travel through any other means to reach Lithos or had any connecting bridge that washed along with the flow of the river long time back. There also might be some other mode of communication that was not investigated thoroughly. Also in ancient times the mode of business was exchange of commodities so there might be chances that it was sold through any local market common for both the places.
Since the argument talks about the prehistoric period the mode of transportation or communication might be destroyed with time but the tradition follows and get better as well as enhanced with time. Since much research was not done on transportation it shows no clear evidence to prove that Palean baskets were not authenthic and uniquely from Palean.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...s it was found at another place as well.From all the time, be it ancient or modern t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... nearby same river were almost similar. If research would have followed then there...
^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had followed'?
Suggestion: had followed
... river were almost similar. If research would have followed then there was a chance that it was als...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ut the tradition follows and get better as well as enhanced with time. Since much ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'apart from', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.226086956522 0.25644967241 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.165217391304 0.15541462614 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0869565217391 0.0836205057962 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0826086956522 0.0520304965353 159% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0217391304348 0.0272364105082 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.152173913043 0.125424944231 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0478260869565 0.0416121511921 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48553481885 2.79052419416 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0217391304348 0.026700313972 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121739130435 0.113004496875 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0173913043478 0.0255425247493 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00869565217391 0.0127820249294 68% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1281.0 2731.13054187 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 221.0 446.07635468 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7963800905 6.12365571057 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.57801047555 84% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.276018099548 0.378187486979 73% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.199095022624 0.287650121315 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.135746606335 0.208842608468 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0678733031674 0.135150697306 50% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48553481885 2.79052419416 89% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 207.018472906 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.469332199767 121% => OK
Word variations: 54.5163650456 52.1807786196 104% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 20.039408867 40% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 27.625 23.2022227129 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5915229225 57.7814097925 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.125 141.986410481 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 23.2022227129 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 0.724660767414 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.14285714286 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 47.5345022624 51.9672348444 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.58064516129 1.8405768891 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258467426701 0.441005458295 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.160919175644 0.135418324435 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0769720402971 0.0829849096947 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.611252068395 0.58762219726 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108982975361 0.147661913831 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125241008411 0.193483328276 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570632557352 0.0970749176394 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.335433729244 0.42659136922 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0326195581977 0.0774707102158 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195533478002 0.312017818177 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159962715814 0.0698173142475 23% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.87684729064 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 5.36822660099 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.