Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
In the given paragraph the author spoke about woven baskets and concluded that they were not uniquely Palean, author told that the woven baskets which are similar in pattern too were also found in some other place called Lithos this statement tempt us to follow authors conclusion that baskets were not uniquely Palean, But it is fallacious to do so.
Author told that there were no boats of Palean were found, So that the baskets were not uniquely Palean the assumption is false as the boats they used might be of Lithos and also these woven baskets might be used for trading purposes that is to carry their goods either from Palean to Lithos or form Lithos to Palean. In this process some one form Palean who visited Lithos to carry goods might have lost his basket in Lithos.
And the river which author spoke about is situated between the two villages. And the river might exist or does not exist at ancient times. Even if it exists it might be not that much broad as it is now, it might be narrow through which people can cross with their foot instead of boats for this reason might the archaeologists did not found any boats near. As we all know the things in the world change from time and climate changes due to calamities.based on the statement no boats were found we cannot conclude that the baskets were not uniquely Palean.
And the basket found in the Lithos might be carried away from Palean by tornado or floods caused in Palean or people migrated from palean to Lithos for cultivation or for better living purpose might carried it with them.
Based on the authors premises saying or concluding that baskets were not uniquely Palean is fallacious, Thus palean basket is made uniquely in Palean.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot uniquely Palean, author told that the woven baskets which are similar in patte...
^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is fallacious to do so. Author told that there were no boats of Palean were ...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
... form Lithos to Palean. In this process some one form Palean who visited Lithos to carry...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Palean who visited Lithos to carry goods might have lost his basket in Lithos. ...
^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed on the statement no boats were found we cannot conclude that the baskets were...
^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hos might be carried away from Palean by tornado or floods caused in Palean or pe...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235109717868 0.25644967241 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.213166144201 0.15541462614 137% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0532915360502 0.0836205057962 64% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0595611285266 0.0520304965353 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0470219435737 0.0272364105082 173% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.134796238245 0.125424944231 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0564263322884 0.0416121511921 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.17808867837 2.79052419416 78% => OK
Infinitives: 0.025078369906 0.026700313972 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0846394984326 0.113004496875 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0344827586207 0.0255425247493 135% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0156739811912 0.0127820249294 123% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1723.0 2731.13054187 63% => OK
No of words: 304.0 446.07635468 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66776315789 6.12365571057 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3125 0.378187486979 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.177631578947 0.287650121315 62% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0789473684211 0.208842608468 38% => More words length more than 7 chars wanted.
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0427631578947 0.135150697306 32% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.17808867837 2.79052419416 78% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 207.018472906 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460526315789 0.469332199767 98% => OK
Word variations: 44.9504080623 52.1807786196 86% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 20.039408867 45% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 33.7777777778 23.2022227129 146% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.374634928 57.7814097925 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.444444444 141.986410481 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7777777778 23.2022227129 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.724660767414 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 51.5409356725 51.9672348444 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.33333333333 1.8405768891 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300340389894 0.441005458295 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.18072658519 0.135418324435 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.132079307511 0.0829849096947 159% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.730119700326 0.58762219726 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.230082355583 0.147661913831 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155175741975 0.193483328276 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634428053418 0.0970749176394 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.339753977196 0.42659136922 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0892570405569 0.0774707102158 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198153424787 0.312017818177 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345793066908 0.0698173142475 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.33743842365 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 6.46551724138 15% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 14.657635468 55% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.