Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument that the palean basket were not native to the palean historic community as such is a vague and judgemental opinion rather than a fact. Often what appears to the vision of an onlooker can be delusional and flawed outlook. There have been many famous instances from the past wherein articles of a particular historic civilisation have been found elsewhere. For example the peacock throne that once was a part of India during the time of the mughals is presently located elsewhere. The main reasons for such confusions are the lack of exploring possibilities of communication and migration between two or more ancient civilisations that existed around the same time in history by the parochial archaelogists who are predilected to their opinions.
The primary argument that has been blatantly used by the author here is that the palean baskets that were supposed to be native to palean civilisation were also found in another ancient village called lithos that was seperated from palean village by a naturally deep and vigorous river known as Brim. This statement in itself is too inflammatory and vague. Export and import of exquisite products are not only a zeitgeist of today but have also been a zeitgeist of ancient times. So there very well could have been a way of transportation and haul of communication between these two villages. It is also equally possible that the haul hasn't been found yet . However even if this were to be ruled out as a plausibility then there still is the definite possibility of a bridge that might have been built over the river but might have been demolished in some diabolical storm or floods that ensued well before the civilisation was discovered along with the baskets.
The secondary argument that the author has used a tool to espouse his theory is that the remains of no boats were found during the excavation and is predilected to his intuition that boats were the means of transportation between those two villages seperated by the river. This in itself is ironical as there hasn't been other possibilities that have been proposed as an alternative to the very same issue of concern. Additionally, there might have also been the usage of boats for transportation across the river. The possible reason that there were not any remains found however is a subject of mundane logic that the boats might have been subjected to natural disasters over time due to which their remains might have been washed away elsewhere. Now it would be really funny if the archaelogists come up with another laughable theory that the boat remains of palean village were found elsewhere in another civilisation and that the boat usage method as such was not native to the palean village. Another possibility which could strongly repudiate this biased opinion is the possibility of land transportation either by an alternative longer route or over a shorter route by means of a bridge as discussed earlier. Hence, considering these theories as a possibility it becomes more overwhelming to refute the one that has been proposed by the author.
If the findings however were legitimate along with the theory that has been proposed as an argument, then the author needs to specify the efforts taken to explore the possibilities of a bridge built on the river as well as take a natural calamity into consideration. Unless more clarity is provided on this argument in the light of new explorations or further research, this would be nothing more than an undermined, equivocal, ambiguous plausibilty. Further study and the ability of the archaelogists to be open to suggestions however may serve as a good idea to explore all the possibilities before jumping to any conclusion instantly merely based on intuition. We will never know which of the theories at the end could be refuted but definitely a broader opinion and non dogmatic approach is necessary in such cases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... native to the palean historic community as such is a vague and judgemental opini...
^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilisation have been found elsewhere. For example the peacock throne that once was...
^^
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time of the mughals is presently located elsewhere. The main reasons for such con...
^^
Line 1, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n two or more ancient civilisations that existed around the same time in history ...
^^
Line 1, column 723, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... history by the parochial archaelogists who are predilected to their opinions. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho are predilected to their opinions. The primary argument that has been blata...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 658, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... is also equally possible that the haul hasnt been found yet . However even if this w...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 678, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sible that the haul hasnt been found yet . However even if this were to be ruled o...
^^
Line 2, column 681, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...le that the haul hasnt been found yet . However even if this were to be ruled out as a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as discovered along with the baskets. The secondary argument that the author h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion and is predilected to his intuition that boats were the means of transportat...
^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...er. This in itself is ironical as there hasnt been other possibilities that have been...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that has been proposed by the author. If the findings however were legitimate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ibilities of a bridge built on the river as well as take a natural calamity into...
^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a bridge built on the river as well as take a natural calamity into considerati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, really, second, so, still, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 51.0 19.6327345309 260% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 13.6137724551 176% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 28.8173652695 135% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 55.5748502994 149% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3245.0 2260.96107784 144% => OK
No of words: 652.0 441.139720559 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97699386503 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05314661074 4.56307096286 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83787681834 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 204.123752495 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432515337423 0.468620217663 92% => OK
syllable_count: 1069.2 705.55239521 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8227189617 57.8364921388 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 119.503703932 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6363636364 23.324526521 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 5.25449101796 285% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232496930567 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760701302939 0.0743258471296 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706639960106 0.0701772020484 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151029561284 0.128457276422 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854882122012 0.0628817314937 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.3799401198 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.3550499002 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 98.500998004 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.