Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership

Essay topics:

Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.

In this issue, the author allegation is that the managers and the principals of almost any field should be changed after five years, because he only sees the success for any enterprise in new leaders. I believe this argument is to some extent credible. I agree with the statement insofar as the new leaders are beneficial to their respective enterprises. However, we should bear in mind that experienced leaders role in many of the biggest business in the world is undeniable.

First and foremost, in my perspective, the author's claim about the new leader’s role in their businesses is acceptable, because, these young leaders are often very motivated and motivation is one of the most important aspects to achieve success in any field of work. In addition, these new leaders are often full of new ideas. Since they have not got stocked in the routine process of work, their mind is fresh and more flexible and therefore, they often seek for new ways of managing the business. Furthermore, a young leader is more up to dated, and is often familiar with the most recent technologies and services around the world, and these characteristics are beneficial for any enterprise.

Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons why new leaders are very advantageous to their businesses, those leaders can also pose certain problems of their own. Admittedly, these new leaders are not as experienced as the old managers and as a result, they can make a great deal of wrong decisions. Their inexperienced character also can make them confused in processing many of a manager's tasks, since these jobs are often very complicated and crucial. Besides, these young leaders, based on their age, are more likely to take risks. No one can ever refute that taking risks, is a part of any business and the ability to take risks is very substantiate to approach accomplishments, but this risks should be logically explained. Taking too much risk is not advantageous for any one and it might drown a large company.

Finally, we should bear in mind, that the experienced managers and leaders are also play an indispensable role in the process of success in their businesses. An experienced leader is wise enough to take the best decisions in a short time because they have experienced many of these situations during their management. In addition, they might have enough creativity in their business because they have faced different problems and they have overcome them.

By and large, I believe that the issue is credible to some extent, but we should not limit the path of success to the new leaders. Different factors can make an enterprise successful, and the leader of that business, is just one of these factors. New leaders are beneficial due to their characteristics and they also have some disadvantages. The experienced leaders are also appreciable and should be respected. And we should use their merit experience in different fields. Maybe the optimum trend in this issue is to combine the fresh mind of a young and the experience of an old manager in order to get the best result.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (49 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: No one can ever refute that taking risks, is a part of any business and the ability to take risks is very substantiate to approach accomplishments, but this risks should be logically explained.
Description: A qualifier, pre is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to very and substantiate
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and risks

flaws:
A lot of duplicate words or sentences. Look:

No. of Words: 516 while No. of Different Words: 212

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 516 350
No. of Characters: 2496 1500
No. of Different Words: 212 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.766 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.837 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.75 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 130 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.435 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.934 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.652 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.507 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.132 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5