Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Governments have ineluctable responsibility to solve problems of citizen. It is important for government is to solve current problems but they should also focus on solution of anticipated problems. If we consider current situation of anticipated problems like global warming, pollution, natural disasters ( Earthquake ,Flood, Tsunami etc.) then we can definitely say that government should pay more attention on trying to solve the anticipated problems of future. These are the important issue related to the future existence of world.

Nowadays we are not facing that much adverse effects of global warming but meantime we are also aware of the problems of global warming which will be faced by our future generations. Due to global warming earth atmosphere temperature is increasing consequently poles ices are melting and mean sea level is increasing. If mean sea level will constantly increase then time will come in near future that our earth will sink in the oceans. So, it is an anticipated problem but i have explained about the adverse effect of global warming. To avoid this problem government should pay attention to reduce global warming effect by implementing strict laws about pollution, forest cutting, etc. If now, governments will not focus on these problems then it will get worse and will become intractable.

Natural disasters are also an anticipated problems and it can destroy the whole world in very less time. So, government should be always prepared to face natural disasters like, earthquake, tsunami, flood etc. It is also not a current problem but we cannot avoid these anticipated problems. For example we can see that how disasters was 2001 Tsunami in Southeast Asia and 2010 earthquake in Japan.

One of the important reasons of focusing on future problem is limited amount of natural resources. We know that natural resources are limited and time will come in the near future that all of our natural resources will become vanished. So, to avoid this situation government should focus on to develop other options so that use of natural resources can be minimized.

In sum, I would say that although governments have many current problems but above mentioned future problems are more critical so government should focus on anticipated problems. These problems can affect the existence of human. For future generation, one of our main responsibilities is to give them a better world.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (29 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: If we consider current situation of anticipated problems like global warming, pollution, natural disasters Earthquake ,Flood, Tsunami etc. then we can definitely say that government should pay more attention on trying to solve the anticipated problems of future.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to disasters and Earthquake

Sentence: These are the important issue related to the future existence of world.
Description: The fragment the important issue is not usually preceded by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is

Sentence: Due to global warming earth atmosphere temperature is increasing consequently poles ices are melting and mean sea level is increasing.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to poles and ices

flaws:
No. of Different Words: 171 200
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 388 350
No. of Characters: 1985 1500
No. of Different Words: 171 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.438 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.116 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.768 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.7 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.357 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.587 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.191 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5