Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research and development help contribute to nations development and to help man kind. But several researches in the past have proved devastating. I agree with the authors statement that government should place restriction on research and development. Restriction should be laid upon researchs which have deleterious effect on nature and human.
In the early 17th and 18th century, several diseases would go undetected and without cure. People during that era thought diseases were a curse or its punishment from god. Black plaque in England during the 16th century exemplifies how disease would result into many people dieing. But nowadays plaques have practically vanished not to say that viral infections like H1N1 still exists. If it wasn't for the research scholar, these plagues would have killed thousand more men.
During the 1940, scienctists started experimenting on nuclear science which had tremendous power. This nuclear power can be used in generating electricity with really high efficiency but rather it became a power weapon. Hiroshima and Nagasaki attack is an example of the devastating effects of some researchs. The recent chemical posion attack by syrian government on its own people is yet another example how some scientific research can be harmful. Government, therefore must keep in check the researchs of these kind and put restriction on them.
Research and development should be carried out with mankind as priority. Government should restrict researches on mass destruction. Research in medicine, renewable energy sources and like-wise should always be encouraged by government.
Sentence: Scientific research and development help contribute to nations development and to help man kind.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: nation's development
Sentence: I agree with the authors statement that government should place restriction on research and development.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: author's statement
Sentence: Black plaque in England during the 16th century exemplifies how disease would result into many people dieing.
Error: dieing Suggestion: ?
Sentence: During the 1940, scienctists started experimenting on nuclear science which had tremendous power.
Error: scienctists Suggestion: scientists
Sentence: The recent chemical posion attack by syrian government on its own people is yet another example how some scientific research can be harmful.
Error: posion Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.588 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.582 7.5
No. of Words: 248 350
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 248 350
No. of Characters: 1346 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.968 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.427 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.807 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.588 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.582 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.294 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.303 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.523 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5