Issue: "Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact', almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in future."
The issue that many of scientific theories invariably prove to be inaccurate may not true about all scientific theories. Important scientific theories, for instance Newton's law in physics, had been proven by many other scientists. This theories and laws are base of many other theories and articles.
On one hand if a theory had been proven with scientific process and ultimate caution had been used by author it will accepted in big scientific parties. On the other hand scientific parties, which examine theories and articles, have a lot caution in referee of an article or theory because their reputation is based on their accepted articles.
However many of this articles prove to be wrong or inaccurate. Theory and article examination agencies like IEEE, will blacklist people who try to submit their article without powerful test data and if scientists cheat in their article they will be banned forever.
There are many article which have good test data and very well foundation but in future this articles may prove to be wrong because someone else claim an exception. But we should trust big agencies like IEEE, so simply we should avoid plebeian talks about science and yellow magazines and examine every news by its references.
In conclusion i should say that skepticism is good, it help us to determine if a theory have good foundation, powerful test data and well-known source. So simply we can reject the articles, news and theories which are week. At last we should trust proven science to live with it and use its benefits. What i am writing is also unproven and should first rate then publish.
Sentence: This theories and laws are base of many other theories and articles.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to This and theories
Sentence: On one hand if a theory had been proven with scientific process and ultimate caution had been used by author it will accepted in big scientific parties.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to will and accepted
Sentence: However many of this articles prove to be wrong or inaccurate.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and articles
Sentence: There are many article which have good test data and very well foundation but in future this articles may prove to be wrong because someone else claim an exception.
Description: The word well is not usually used as an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to well
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and articles
Sentence: In conclusion i should say that skepticism is good, it help us to determine if a theory have good foundation, powerful test data and well-known source.
Description: The fragment it help us is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace help with verb, past tense
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Different Words: 144 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 271 350
No. of Characters: 1316 1500
No. of Different Words: 144 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.057 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.856 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.455 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.624 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.846 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.374 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.648 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.151 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5