In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The statement asserts that, in any field, power should be changed after five years. That idea may seem reasonable but in deeper analysis, there are situations, where changing power that frequently, can thwart development. So, I agree with the statement with some qualifications.
As we human always wish to have power and we love to exercise our superiority over others, and that frequently happens when we are in a leadership position for a long time. When a person is in superior power for a long time, there is a greater possibility that an autocrat is gradually building up inside him. That type of person is contemptuous to other's ideas and focuses to maintain his supremacy over others. Development comes to a standstill and the subordinated become demotivated because of unchanged hierarchy. In result, that type of people turn out to be the destructive force for the organization sometimes and that is why it is necessary for them to step down for the shake of the country, organization . For example, if Hitler had been abdicated from his power after five years, than the mass destruction in WWII would not have occurred.
On the other hand, there are exceptions, a fact can not be the standard. There are a lot of examples, where the leader changed the whole scenario by his hard work, dedication, serving the nation/organization for a long time. If we consider the example of Steve Jobs, founder of Apple, who brought his company to a standard which everyone envies, only by his years of work, passion and imagination. Moreover, frequent change in leadership, often hampers the total development. The new leader needs to start from the beginning in most of the time because of his disparity in view from the previous leader. Again, always there are some people, who want to turn the system obsolete by infusing confusion and hostility in the organization. That is why, their efforts need to be subverted, pave the way for the holistic development, which can be achieved through a leader, who is experienced enough and unwavering in his focus.
So, to conclude, it is evident that, it is too extreme to say that all the leaders should step down in every five years. Leaders should be given sufficient time to prove their efficacy, if they prove to be inefficient, they should be abdicated. Whereas, if they can bring out something good , they should be given enough time to substantiate that development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r the shake of the country, organization . For example, if Hitler had been abdicat...
^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as, if they can bring out something good , they should be given enough time to sub...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'whereas', 'for example', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222462203024 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.155507559395 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0626349892009 0.0880659088768 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0323974082073 0.0497285424764 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0518358531317 0.0444667217837 117% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125269978402 0.12292977631 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0323974082073 0.0406280797675 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90599904647 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0345572354212 0.030933414821 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0107991360691 0.0016655270985 648% => OK
Determiners: 0.097192224622 0.0997080785238 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0237580993521 0.0249443105267 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0259179265659 0.0148568991511 174% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2422.0 2732.02544248 89% => OK
No of words: 410.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90731707317 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.321951219512 0.366273622748 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251219512195 0.280924506359 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182926829268 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134146341463 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90599904647 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539024390244 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 61.5261697403 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5789473684 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7365851859 59.4972553346 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.473684211 141.124799967 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.473684210526 0.674092028746 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.7008985879 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.58558558559 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33255550069 0.391690518653 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124041185182 0.123202303941 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0932442648363 0.077325440228 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.525418701631 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116428767968 0.149214159877 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134056428543 0.161403998019 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764871402473 0.0892212321368 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.287878792811 0.385218514788 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.128368500731 0.0692045440612 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226408921739 0.275328986314 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365363402179 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.