In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Changes are the law of nature but it is not mandatory that these changes have to necessarily come after a fixed duration of time. The changes should be brought only when it is absolutely necessary and not for just the sake of doing it. The same stand should be taken even in the field of business, education, politics and government also.
For an organization to succeed, the involvement of fresh blood as well the foresightedness of an experienced leader is essential. As far as business and education fields are concerned, the duration of the term served by a leader, say the CEO or the director of an organization should never be the criterion for their stepping down and this fact is very obvious in the present world. The veteran leader is far more experienced than the young leader who would succeed him and has witnessed the growth of the organization, the ups and downs and fought hard during the crunch times. So such a veteran leader is more vital for the continued success of the company. Let us consider Microsoft where Bill Gates is leading it successfully since the last 20 or more years. Even in the Indian companies like Infosys and Wipro the director is the same since its inception and these are conducting their business with panache. To the credit of these leaders they have been able to bring the required innovations to the company and infuse new ideas to contribute to the continual development of the organization as well as the workforce. These leaders are well assisted by the pool of young people working just under them and ready to fill in the big boots whenever they step down. So till the time the leader is able to contribute to the cause of the concerned, he is innovative enough and is able to take vital decisions when required, there is absolutely no need for them to step down. There need not be any predefined time length for their service. Also whenever a change is brought it should be made sure the new leader is mature enough to handle the responsibilities he is endowed with.
As far as politics and government are concerned, while it is not imperative that such a strict time length for a person to hold the office of power is followed, history has shown that sometimes when a person has held power for a long time, he has become a tyrant. We can take Hilter as an example for this case. It is quite easy for those in high post to misuse their power when they are at the top of the world. Let us consider the case of Indonesia. In 1965, Suharto became Indonesia’s president. Initially he was a good leader and brought good economic development to the country. Lured by his achievements, people trusted him and he continued to remain in power for more than 10 years. Then he was corrupted and eventually became a tyrant. Today Indonesia is one of the poorest and most unstable regions of the world.
In India also, there have been instances where politicians have misused their power when they held the office for long. In Bihar, one of the states of India the chief minister Mr. Laloo Prasad Yadav held office for almost 15 years and was involved in too many corruptions. The state did not see growth until the government was changed. While on the other we can consider the example of Mr. Narendra Kr. Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat(India) who has been holding the office for 15 years now but the state still sees the highest GDP in the country. To avoid such kind of predicaments, all democratic states of the world give people a chance to choose their leaders after some fixed duration. So people elect them based on their past achievements. If the leader has performed well enough, he is re-elected and continues in the office of power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...anges should be brought only when it is absolutely necessary and not for just the sake of doing it. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ess, education, politics and government also. For an organization to succeed, the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1540, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...edefined time length for their service. Also whenever a change is brought it should ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: CONTINUE_TO_REMAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...achievements, people trusted him and he continued to remain in power for more than 10 years. Then h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rowth until the government was changed. While on the other we can consider the exampl...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'kind of', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222535211268 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.159154929577 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0830985915493 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0704225352113 0.0497285424764 142% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0507042253521 0.0444667217837 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114084507042 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.043661971831 0.0406280797675 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61699568079 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0267605633803 0.030933414821 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.123943661972 0.0997080785238 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0112676056338 0.0249443105267 45% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0154929577465 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3702.0 2732.02544248 136% => OK
No of words: 657.0 452.878318584 145% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63470319635 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06280665599 4.58838876751 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.290715372907 0.366273622748 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.196347031963 0.280924506359 70% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.144596651446 0.200843997647 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.100456621005 0.132149295362 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61699568079 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 219.290929204 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456621004566 0.48968727796 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 56.8752085953 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6194690265 150% => OK
Sentence length: 21.1935483871 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1095166123 59.4972553346 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.419354839 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1935483871 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.354838709677 0.674092028746 53% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 40.8282515834 51.4728631049 79% => OK
Elegance: 1.3567839196 1.64882698954 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313546136457 0.391690518653 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112483706058 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0824944663815 0.077325440228 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.485643554844 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182774756611 0.149214159877 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12336175665 0.161403998019 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701643047721 0.0892212321368 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.522695717558 0.385218514788 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0283844937112 0.0692045440612 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243984353757 0.275328986314 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191654524398 0.0653680567796 29% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88274336283 287% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 13.5995575221 169% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.