The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
The author of the issue highlights that if human beings do the works with the sense of passion and interest, it could result in the best and most effective ideas. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that whether ordinary or complex, interest and passion play a significant role in people's thought. Indeed, the best idea or decision comes from a finite interest in matters. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that people always have done their tasks by their own free will and with a sense of satisfaction. So, nothing could force them to do any work without any interest in that field. Broadly speaking, fields of study is a vivid example for this case. When people opt for their major by their interest and passion, nothing could discourage them to stop whether study in a sophisticated field or not. In fact, when people take their interest into consideration, not only can they come up with the best idea but also can reach a higher level of study in that field. To elucidate more on this issue, new and valuable ideas just build on a foundation of interest and no one could neglect the importance of enthusiasm while they are working. As a matter of fact, hardly ever can new ideas show themselves up without taking passion and interest into account.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that somehow new ideas arise from simplest thing need to be proven. Generally phrased, we cannot accept that everything comes up with an interest or common things is correct. For instance, consider people work on numerical calculation in various fields of study, so, there are data, information, analysis, the way of researching and so forth, which their accuracy should be proven. Indeed, acceptance of such ideas might not be a wise decision owing to the fact that they may create some serious problem in the long run. Delve further into the issue, we should not be allowed to agree with every new idea arise from common things. In fact, we have to investigate about their reliability and accuracy to trust the idea.
However, what I alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits, it has, indisputably, there are the wide variety of things that have been invented with a new idea though simplest things. For example, some ideas come from basic needs of humanity in different stages like need warm clothes when it freezing cold, or need vehicles to travel beyond the earth. In such situation, people always come up with the best idea due to the fact that they are ordinary and commonplace things around them.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'from the simplest'.
Suggestion: from the simplest
...noticed is that somehow new ideas arise from simplest thing need to be proven. Generally phra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...a. However, what I alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, while, broadly speaking, for example, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2343.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86099585062 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59188422684 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514522821577 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3642129097 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.869565217 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9565217391 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311620276637 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828915998701 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791988805649 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149693188901 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816863745127 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.