The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
To convince someone with a contradictory viewpoint does not guarantee that the argument will be tested best. The best test of any argument can be done by testing legitimacy of several facts on which it depends. In addition, any argument's acceptance ,when tested against opposite view point, will depend upon that persons knowledge and learning abilites. Therefore it cannot be inferred that when someone with contradictory theory is convinced the argument is successful.
To begin with, for any argument to be successful it needs to be based on vital information and reliable facts. These details serve as evident solid grounds for the argument to build up. Without these details the argument appears merely wishful thinking this renders any argument questionable. Wishful thinking can never succeed in convincing a considerable amount of contradictions. Although, pursuing an amenable opposition seems achievable, but it will not guarantee the completeness of argument.
Sometimes, it can be very easy to pursue an opposite minded person into accepting the reliability of facts and support the argument. But this does not give enough reliability to the argument itself. Brainstorming against contradictory views sounds like a good idea to find loopholes or gaps that might have insinuated into the argument. But it should not be the only way to assure the quality of argument.
However, with a community or a set of people who can be trusted with the completeness of their knowledge, one can say that most of the gaps in any argument can be covered. These people can be masters of their field and brainstorming with them could give reliable inputs for testing the argument's worthiness. In such situations only, one can tend to be sure that the best test for the idea has been carried out and now it can be presented further.
Conclusively, merely trying to convince a contradictory person will undermine the detailing of an argument and could convert into more of a persuaded discussion than open exchange of ideas, until and unless an analogy which provides equitable exchange of theories on both ends is carried out.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...s on which it depends. In addition, any arguments acceptance ,when tested against opposit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. In addition, any arguments acceptance ,when tested against opposite view point,...
^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...osite view point, will depend upon that persons knowledge and learning abilites. Theref...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ersons knowledge and learning abilites. Therefore it cannot be inferred that when someone...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...ld give reliable inputs for testing the arguments worthiness. In such situations only, on...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, therefore, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1976744186 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92947110815 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526162790698 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3483367878 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.176470588 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242970995074 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961987988714 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05327463103 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149939973779 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481490237094 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.