The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The Issue presents that the best test of an argument is the argument’s ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. However, personally speaking, the convincing ability of the argument is just one aspect in which the its reliability cannot be testified. The best test of an argument demands the features as follows.
First of all, the convincing ability of the argument is necessary. In the argument, the arguer is expected to draw conclusion. To justify his/her conclusion, the sufficient evidence is supposed to provide in the argument, in which readers owning critical thinking can evaluate the correctness of argument. Someone with an opposing viewpoint can fairly regard the argument as an excellent argument if the assumption or conclusion is proved by warranted, specific evidence.
Nevertheless, the best test of an argument still needs extra methods to certificate. It is significant for a scientific argument that its result is repeatable; as for an educational argument the extra experiments are quite vital.
A scientific argument is required to include specific samples, detailed experiment setting, unambiguous process and fairly results. Such as an image enhancement method in computing programming, it must involve the representive sample pictures, image enhancement algorithm, the experimental setting and operation process. In the end, the result is demand to attest to the efficiency of the method. The conclusion will be more persuasive if the argument is concluded in this way in scientific argument.
Besides, in normal life, people will connect their living experience to the argument. The argument will be dubious if it reverses the common knowledge. To test the correctness, responsible arguer will encourage people to make use of it in their life, for example, in cooking. To test the smell of one surprising fruit, the argument cannot satisfy the curiosity of people.
In sum, the considerate method to testify an argument not only demands the convincing ability, but also the significant characteristics referring above. Only in this way, an detailed and believable argument can be winnowed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...he argument is just one aspect in which the its reliability cannot be testified. The be...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 172, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tics referring above. Only in this way, an detailed and believable argument can be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, as for, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52424242424 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13335238257 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50303030303 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8917224385 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9473684211 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3684210526 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349090914388 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124309377235 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102184805314 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203611889057 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113683238721 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.