Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
Whether managing a business or leading a country, one can easily get seduced by amount of power he has, which can result in different types of misuses. The author of this recommendation states that it is necessary to shift leaders every 5 years, but if someone is excelling on his position, there is really no need to replace him. The new leader would not know all the rules of the game (whatever that game is – politics, business or education), so it would take some time for him to learn his new role, which could be counter productive. Furthermore, if the current manager has shown great results in the past, he should stick to what he is doing best. That would benefit the whole community. Lastly, there is no reason for someone who already has strong connections with his workers or people to be succeeded by a stranger just because he passed the five year deadline.
When Barack Obama rose into power, he did not know everything he knows today. It took several years for him to embrace his new role as a president of the United States, which can be seen from some wrong moves he made in the beginning. Thanks to democratic elections, he remained the leader for two consecutive terms and made some important decisions close to the end of his second term, like approving the same sex marriage. This example is showing that becoming a good manager requires time, thus managers should not be changing every now and then.
Secondly, if a boss has shown that he is responsible and possesses an expert level of knowledge and experience, it is better for a company to let him do his job for as long as he can. Marko Stjepanovic, chief editor of Serbian newspaper Blic has managed to double the number of monthly visitors of Blic news website during his first five years on that position. That is why owners of the company decided to trust him with a second and third term. They were not wrong. In the meantime, thanks to Marko’s decisions and actions, Blic became the leading media in the country. It is clear that letting Marko stay was a right thing to do.
Perhaps the best example to illustrate why those in power should not step down after five years is the one of a school principal. Say a principal is in charge for the last 15 years. That means he already knows the school curriculum, strengths and weaknesses of teachers and has built strong connections with parents and the rest of community. Replacing him with a new principal after half of a decade would mean that the principal would have to spend much time for earning people’s trust.
Considering all stated, it is clear that leaders should stay in power even after exceeding the five year limit. Some could argue that this praxis leads to totalitarianism, but that can be easily surpassed with elections or yearly revisions of manager’s professional accomplishments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...e, thus managers should not be changing every now and then. Secondly, if a boss has shown that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'lastly', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23381294964 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.161870503597 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0719424460432 0.0880659088768 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0431654676259 0.0497285424764 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0557553956835 0.0444667217837 125% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.113309352518 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0413669064748 0.0406280797675 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6414680586 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0287769784173 0.030933414821 93% => OK
Particles: 0.00179856115108 0.0016655270985 108% => OK
Determiners: 0.102517985612 0.0997080785238 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0287769784173 0.0249443105267 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0161870503597 0.0148568991511 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2857.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 499.0 452.878318584 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7254509018 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.308617234469 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.218436873747 0.280924506359 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142284569138 0.200843997647 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110220440882 0.132149295362 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6414680586 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 219.290929204 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537074148297 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 65.1471707205 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.6818181818 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7795978614 59.4972553346 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.863636364 141.124799967 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6818181818 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.674092028746 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 44.5255055566 51.4728631049 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.48965517241 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250886549399 0.391690518653 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0620879516852 0.123202303941 50% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.053036737659 0.077325440228 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480991582433 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139161209288 0.149214159877 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982188207653 0.161403998019 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737200666866 0.0892212321368 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.354751230053 0.385218514788 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0818263155671 0.0692045440612 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171068723111 0.275328986314 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441840645854 0.0653680567796 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.4325221239 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.