Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Those in power have a responsibility to guide and maneuver their organization through both rough times and burgeoning ones. In doing so, a leader must have foresight and vision to accomplish their goals, which can sometimes take a great deal of time. Therefore, a great leader, one who can effectively guide a group of followers to accomplish certain goals in an efficient and benevolent manner, should be allowed to lead for longer than five years.
Proponents of the idea that those in power should step down after five years, be it business, politics, education, or government, may initially have bad leaders come to mind. They argue that ruthless dictators such as Hitler, poor CEOs that move an organization into insolvency, and tenured principals who have become complacent in their roles should be replaced. In fact, if those in power would step down after a certain period of time, any poor leadership can quickly be mitigated by the election of a new power, one who can correct the errors of their predecessor. In addition, with different leadership, a higher percentage of the population will feel represented since each new leader may have different points of views, agendas, and beliefs. With a system of checks and balances, such as the one in place for the US government, authorities can better serve the population by having more motivation to finish their tasks quickly while they are still in office.
However, there are instances of a great leader, such as Bill Gates or Franklin D. Roosevelt, who led their company or country to success. Being a wonderful leader requires the foresight of a visionary, which then later on translates into action. Within a period of five years, there is no guarantee that the entire plan can be completed in an efficacious manner. One instance that quickly comes to mind is Abraham Lincoln, who fought to free America from the grips of slavery. It is quite fathomable that had his untimely assassination not occurred, segregation within parts of the country, especially in the South, would have ceased much earlier and not lingered well into the 20th century.
In addressing the issue of having a poor leader refusing to give up power, the organization should have a system of removing the leader, but only if he or she is not performing their duty. The importance of having power distributed throughout the company or government is essential in keeping their chief in check. However, it should not be mandatory for individuals in power to step down, especially if they are completing their mission in a timely manner that is supported by others in their organization. In fact, it should be the responsibility of the people who have less power to wisely choose a great leader.
A leader’s goal is to provide a mission and vision for others under them to follow. It is imperative that they complete the goals of the organization in a thorough and effective manner, which can take longer than five years. As a result, although a leader can have the option to step down, it should not be mandatory for them to do so after a certain time frame.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n power would step down after a certain period of time, any poor leadership can quickly be mit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficacious manner" with adverb for "efficacious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e that the entire plan can be completed in an efficacious manner. One instance that quickly comes to min...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ly if they are completing their mission in a timely manner that is supported by others in their or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2585.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9144486692 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7985107299 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486692015209 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 811.8 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6171262798 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.095238095 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0476190476 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215043624478 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690300261101 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997575315716 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123367926063 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698685772625 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.