Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a

Some people suggest that imagination is a more valuable asset than experience simply because people who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes. It is true that every single person can imagine, however, fewer people could utilize the imagination as personal assets rather than experience.

First of all, it is not the lack of experience leads to imagination, instead, imagination is a intrinsic character of humankind despite the existence of experience. Everyone can imagine, whether an experienced old man or a inexperienced young man. For example, 3-5 years children, who are just able to draw with pencils, can create amazing pictures with innovation, by contrast, Picasso, produced artworks at his age of 90’s. So, imagination is a inherent character of human, rather than the result of lack of experience.

In addition, experience gives maturities rather than established habits and attitudes. It is true that a contemplative man may hesitant in several circumstances, but this very consideration is surely a beneficence, not a constraint. Experience means practice and hard working, which are the core factors of success. The famous story about Leonardo Da Vinci said that it is his practice of thousands of pictures of eggs made him one of the most creative artists. We can infer from this story that the experience play an important roll in Leonardo’s success.

Some people argue that imagination is a more valuable asset than experience, however, they have ignored the causal relationship between the two. In fact, though not the cause of imagination, experience is the catalyst of it. Compare 3-5 years kids’ artworks to artists’, we may find that the kids’ are innovative at first glance. When we investigate more, no more profound elements exist. On the other hand, artists’ artworks are full of varies of innovations, innovations from the incense of experience. Thus, experience can arouse the appearance of innovative idea.

Based on the above reasoning, we can conclude that although imagination is a valuable asset, experience is the fundamental basis. Without experience, imagination may become blindness, create only the naive works without profundity.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to imagination, instead, imagination is a intrinsic character of humankind despit...
^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gine, whether an experienced old man or a inexperienced young man. For example, 3...
^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is age of 90's. So, imagination is a inherent character of human, rather tha...
^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Da Vinci said that it is his practice of thousands of pictures of eggs made him o...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, so, thus, for example, in addition, in fact, first of all, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49715909091 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17535743213 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551136363636 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0382565925 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.842105263 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5263157895 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34301163521 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100692413995 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121107836091 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200306743816 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129406617565 0.0667264976115 194% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.