Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The author of this statement recommends that all faculties must spend time working outside of the academic environment. As far as I am concerned, this is a controversial issue and we can not give the same answer for all courses. I take this position account the following reasons.
First, most professors usually have high theoretical knowledge, which they gained in the university. Nevertheless, working out of academic environment allows them to enrich their knowledge. I think that a small instance can give some light on this topic. When a biology teacher works out of the university, he can gain first information about humans’ effects on nature. In addition, he can use all sense to comprehend of what they teach in the university and even better answer for how to control nature disasters. So, the biggest advantages of the working out for teachers lie in the fact that enriches their knowledge.
A further point we must consider is that usually teachers use boring methods of teaching, which have not more linked with the real world. This policy lets teachers touch nature and adopt their knowledge with the real world. Moreover, they could link theories with real examples and makes their teaching more attractive.
Apart from points I made above, the real world can inspire teachers to discover new things, creating functional equipment, or even painting an awesome paint. As it is known, imagination plays a crucial role in the most field of study, especially art courses. A painter can paint new landscapes out of the university, or writer can gain a new idea for his writing.
In contrast, this policy may be usefulness in some courses such as mathematics. The university has many special facilities that a teacher can not have access them out of university. I think that there is not a better example of a teacher of theoretical physics. This teacher has to use of mathematics equation and computer applications for confirming his theory. In addition, the specialized laboratory allows him to do accurately experiments and gain a better result.
All above evidence supports this fact that working out of academic environment can assists teachers to enrich their knowledge, gain deeper understanding, and improve their method of teaching. Admittedly, as an English proverb “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those have the opposite view partially reasonable that in some field of study, teachers needs to work in the in the specialized laboratories, which only are in the university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y experiments and gain a better result. All above evidence supports this fact th...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 84, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'assist'
Suggestion: assist
...working out of academic environment can assists teachers to enrich their knowledge, gai...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 374, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in the'.
Suggestion: in the
... field of study, teachers needs to work in the in the specialized laboratories, which only ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'apart from', 'as to', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237068965517 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.137931034483 0.157235817809 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0905172413793 0.0880659088768 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0474137931034 0.0497285424764 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.051724137931 0.0444667217837 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129310344828 0.12292977631 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0215517241379 0.0406280797675 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90944504801 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0172413793103 0.030933414821 56% => OK
Particles: 0.00215517241379 0.0016655270985 129% => OK
Determiners: 0.109913793103 0.0997080785238 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0280172413793 0.0249443105267 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0129310344828 0.0148568991511 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2527.0 2732.02544248 92% => OK
No of words: 409.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17848410758 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376528117359 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.300733496333 0.280924506359 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21760391198 0.200843997647 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146699266504 0.132149295362 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90944504801 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525672371638 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 59.1930173022 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5909090909 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6038941699 59.4972553346 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.863636364 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.674092028746 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 48.6642587242 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.63636363636 1.64882698954 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316624795125 0.391690518653 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0824916677096 0.123202303941 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0662474349251 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.510586124371 0.547984918172 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121848690908 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110587786353 0.161403998019 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725834606144 0.0892212321368 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.226764622465 0.385218514788 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.078888009112 0.0692045440612 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192027385434 0.275328986314 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609051409545 0.0653680567796 93% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.