Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field
The issue statement says that critical judgement has value only when it comes from the person who is an expert in that field. Although, it can be both right and wrong but i completely adhere to this point. The reasons for my congruence are experts are well-erudited in a subject, they are well-cognizant of the difficulties a subject possess and lastly, they have the deep insight of the subject so, they have the measures to correct the mistakes and suggest proper remedial measures. The reasons alongwith examples are dilineated below :
Firstly, when you say an erudite person, it means a person who have deep knowledge about a particular subject. Furthermore, when a person who has the knowledge he/she knows better than the other individuals who are just dilettantes. So, only he/she has the potenetial to judge and castize any other individual. A person whose knowledge is very shallow can't judge anyone. For instance, take the case of Football, players are the individuals who are going to play in the ground, commentators and quotidians chastise them but it is their coach who have the right to critisize them because only he has the proper knowledge. Quotidians will waste their time only in critisizing them unnecessariliy. So, only an expert's crititcal judgement is valuable.
Secondly, only exerts know about the difficulty a subject possess. He/She knows about the hurdles which come in every subject because they too went through th same stage at once in their lifetime. So, they can well critise any individual which are just a tyro in the field so that he can not make the same mistakes as they made in their past and they can save money, time as well as energy. For instance, in any reasearch field an expert can guide and judge the novice people. Whereas, a dilletante doesn't know about the subject and problems that may come in the path of person, so it won't be any helpful to critisize and on which basis they are critisizing? Just by perceiving the outher conditions we can't predict from which phase a person went through. So, only can expert make critical judgement.
Lastly, connosuiers have the remedial measures to the things they critisize. So, they have the basis and explanation on which base they are critisizing. Dilettantes can only critisize. Additionally, they can not provide any remedial measures for the mistakes one person has committed. Although, in some cases even the person who are not experts in any field make good judgements too and critisize well. But as we say exceptions are always there so, in majority of the cases it is useless to get a suggestion from the persons who do not have deep knowledge in a subject.
To sum up, I restate that critical judgement has only little value untill it is made by a person who is an expert in the field. The reasons alongwith examples for my stand are explained above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fficulties a subject possess and lastly, they have the deep insight of the subjec...
^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... person whose knowledge is very shallow cant judge anyone. For instance, take the ca...
^^^^
Line 2, column 704, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an expert' or simply 'experts'?
Suggestion: an expert; experts
...itisizing them unnecessariliy. So, only an experts crititcal judgement is valuable. Secon...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he novice people. Whereas, a dilletante doesnt know about the subject and problems tha...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... by perceiving the outher conditions we cant predict from which phase a person went ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84253578732 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69749293572 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431492842536 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.2731066619 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.72 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.56 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203220077497 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717690043697 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100137819654 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149826497924 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577085096856 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.