Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
One of the principle goals of any educational institute is to impart quality education to the students. The achievements and accolades garnered by the students in their career is testament to the excellence of the institute. If it persuades the students what is not right for them, they may opt for a field where they have a greater chance for success. This ultimately results in growth in the reputation for the institute.
Moreover, if the students are given sound advice regarding their weaknesses, their trust in the institute increases. They may recommend the institute for, among other things, the quality of career guidance offered there. The respect and good name of the institute will increase as well.
Another major advantage is that when students are told about the fields where their chances of success are low, they may opt not to choose them for their graduation. This translates to lesser number of incompetent students pertaining a particular field. This makes the job of the teachers much easier, as they get to teach more suitable students.
However, it may happen that the students who are dissuaded from studying a particular field are not as weak as perceived. Perhaps, they may have created the wrong impressions in spite of having the abilities. It is also possible that a student is a late-bloomer, that is, he shows better skills later on. Such inferences, therefore, may turn out to be wrong. But the chances of this happening are quite less.
Convincing a student that he should not take up a field which is beyond his ability not only leads to much better academics and career for the student, but also reduces the strain of the institute. Therefore, I believe educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ch is beyond his ability not only leads to much better academics and career for th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03278688525 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78861277219 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534426229508 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6191590583 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2941176471 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427981115292 0.243740707755 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129759079379 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198096861329 0.0758088955206 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239500652575 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171102186332 0.0667264976115 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.