In this century where students are taught to ‘dream big’ and are encouraged to set aims and goals, it is often we find students with ambitious or unrealistic expectations. The role of educational institutions should be to provide students with the basic knowledge to pursue their goals, as well as guide them in the right direction based on their interests, regardless of their achievements.
Students often work harder and pay more attention in fields of study where they hold a particular interest, in which they find educationally challenging or stimulating. If one is forced to study something they do not find stimulating, the motivation and thrive to study would diminish, which could eventually lead to a less likely chance of success. For example, if a student wants to be a Biologist but performs poorly in Biology exams, but instead exhibits a talent in Art, teachers shouldn’t persuade the student to change his/her mind to pursue Art, which she shows no interest. In doing so, she would not be motivated to learn Art and develop her skills. Isn’t the role of educational institutions to educate and prepare us for the career of our choice? They should be paying more attention so that the student develops her skills and improves in her next Biology exam, instead of discouraging him/her.
One could argue that if teachers give students false hope by supporting their dream, they are setting them up for failure. On the contrary, I believe receiving support and encouragement from teachers provide us with the ‘push’ and the motivation to perform even better, knowing we have their full support. Such drive could provide students with the eagerness to succeed. There is truth in the saying ‘Any expert was once a beginner’, a student could be a beginner now, but teachers have the ability to support and aid them to become an expert later in the future.
Thinking about it, aren’t the most successful people the ones who were least expected to be? Einstein was labelled as a crazy scientist and discouraged by his peers, until his theories were proven correct and deemed a genius. Winston Churchill, who dropped out of school was a daft student and teachers thought he was incorrigible, turned out to be one of the greatest leaders of all time. I believe anyone can succeed if they have the correct drive and persistence to do so.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'as well as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217672413793 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.1875 0.157235817809 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.051724137931 0.0880659088768 59% => OK
Adverbs: 0.051724137931 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0668103448276 0.0444667217837 150% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0948275862069 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0409482758621 0.0406280797675 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90442957543 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0409482758621 0.030933414821 132% => OK
Particles: 0.00431034482759 0.0016655270985 259% => OK
Determiners: 0.073275862069 0.0997080785238 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0193965517241 0.0249443105267 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150862068966 0.0148568991511 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2399.0 2732.02544248 88% => OK
No of words: 397.0 452.878318584 88% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04282115869 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370277078086 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289672544081 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196473551637 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123425692695 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90442957543 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556675062972 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 64.0739610251 55.4138127331 116% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8125 23.380412469 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2036375661 59.4972553346 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.9375 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8125 23.380412469 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4375 0.674092028746 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 53.7797544081 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.15492957746 1.64882698954 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323270076905 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101496681192 0.123202303941 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0617531872239 0.077325440228 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.518108595122 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115633911393 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130357831805 0.161403998019 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655034761041 0.0892212321368 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319307992585 0.385218514788 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0109611600068 0.0692045440612 16% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214348458813 0.275328986314 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686782680695 0.0653680567796 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.