Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Educational institutes are the place where an individual learns so many things. It is the first step in a person's life, which makes one's foundation for life. The topic is a controversial one, stating schools and colleges have a responsibility to deter students from pursuing fields of study in which they might or might not succeed. According to me the decision of opting a field of study depends upon the students, whereas the institutions can play a supporting role by mere giving suggestion to them rather taking the sole responsibility.I am in a disagreement with the author's assertion.
Firstly, a person when grows further old, develops an understanding of its own. The action to discourage a student only on the basis that he/she seems unlikely to succeed is unfair, this illustrates the immaturity of the institutions. Educational institutes are responsible for proper growth of student but, deciding and predicting the future of a person that early is not a wise decision, as a person may develop cognizance and skill with time. Many famous personalities would not have come to existence if they were have been ceased to not pursue their fields of interests.
By dissuading students, institutes might disparage them and their self-confidence in the early age which could lead to seriously bad consequences. It could lead to mental trauma, blight self-assuredness, obstruction in self-growth. Doing this is immoral as it, steals the wisdom and freedom of a person to choose by own, which are his/her rights by birth.
However, an educational institute instead deciding not to opt a field of study for students, should only report students and their kin about their progress regarding that field and to suggest the possibility that the student might or might not be able to burgeon in it. Thus, rather discouraging institutes must provide students with constructive and unbiased opinions, bolstering them to prosper in their careers.
After pondering over the topic, I strongly believe that it is iniquitous that an educational institute take whole and sole responsibility of the career of students and deter them from pursuing fields in which they are not likely to thrive. Institutes should be more like giving their disinterested and useful opinions to students for their profit and welfare helping them achieve success which they desire.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... many things. It is the first step in a persons life, which makes ones foundation for l...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rst step in a persons life, which makes ones foundation for life. The topic is a con...
^^^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... which they might or might not succeed. According to me the decision of opting a field of study...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 541, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...m rather taking the sole responsibility.I am in a disagreement with the authors a...
^
Line 1, column 573, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ibility.I am in a disagreement with the authors assertion. Firstly, a person when gr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...not have come to existence if they were have been ceased to not pursue their fields ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.21359223301 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.179611650485 0.157235817809 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0752427184466 0.0880659088768 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0509708737864 0.0497285424764 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0606796116505 0.0444667217837 136% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.114077669903 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0558252427184 0.0406280797675 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04309383277 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0388349514563 0.030933414821 126% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0946601941748 0.0997080785238 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0315533980583 0.0249443105267 126% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0218446601942 0.0148568991511 147% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2356.0 2732.02544248 86% => OK
No of words: 379.0 452.878318584 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21635883905 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377308707124 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279683377309 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.200527704485 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145118733509 0.132149295362 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04309383277 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543535620053 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 60.7466345814 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 25.2666666667 23.380412469 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4720381895 59.4972553346 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.066666667 141.124799967 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 23.380412469 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 53.2350043975 51.4728631049 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.31666666667 1.64882698954 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396296721372 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0907603452543 0.123202303941 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0667007283301 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.566639597217 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148662163542 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154334189817 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097761437833 0.0892212321368 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319616224449 0.385218514788 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.076939578135 0.0692045440612 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254689776915 0.275328986314 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059126445702 0.0653680567796 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.