Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Extending full support to letting students suggest the content of the courses they learn is not possible. While, we can always consider their inputs under certain circumstances. Several reasons for supporting this instance can be provided.
To begin with, it depends on the class to which students belong, those who have not yet passed high school have an absolutely different attitude than those who are pursuing college degrees. School pupil have predilection for games and recreational activities, and they have low inclination towards studies, they might prefer that subjects like maths and science be dropped from courses, as these subjects are relatively tougher. While, those who are more mature and understand the importance of these subjects, might support the addition of few complex subjects like programming languages and fundamental computer science.
In addition, considering that only mature suggestions are being evaluated, even then, there still will be a strong dilemma in taking any decision. Because, students have different perception about subjects they are being thought. For evidence, Sanskrit is thought in schools till 8th class in India, while few teachers and students support that, as there is no significant use of the language in further studies and career, it shall be dropped. Others suggest that it teaches the fundamentals from which the native language Hindi (which is already included in all curriculum) is derived that is why it is important.
Moreover, we never fully understand the extent to which any subject helps develop our mind. Several articles suggest that during early childhood a kid is able to learn five different languages, but this does not mean that we should make it compulsory for them to learn all five languages.
However, with the evolution of new and complex fields it is a prerequisite to evolve the courses proportionately. Take a look at contemporary school curriculum and you might find it vastly diverged from what you might have learned in your school texts. For evidence, technical subjects like databases and computer programming are now added to school curriculum as mandatory. Without augmenting the content we might be left behind from the practical world out there. And nonetheless only students/alumni can actually understand the importance of this subjects in their lucrative careers.
Conclusively, a thorough analysis of impact should taken into consideration before taking such vital suggestions from students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the courses they learn is not possible. While, we can always consider their inputs un...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... strong dilemma in taking any decision. Because, students have different perception abo...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 546, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n actually understand the importance of this subjects in their lucrative careers. ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 52, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have taken' or 'take'?
Suggestion: have taken; take
...y, a thorough analysis of impact should taken into consideration before taking such v...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, then, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4792746114 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85689281552 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575129533679 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6735192734 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167176604716 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051954444593 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348737709581 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845432729289 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189177379149 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.