Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Education plays very important role in any person’s life and development of his or her personal skills. Also, any country’s development is also somehow dependent on the education of the citizens. If a country has high literacy, then there are high chances that the country’s development grow rapidly. And the education nowadays is getting costlier. Lower class people might not afford higher education. So, I partially agree with the given policy that government should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
In today’s era university education is very much costly. One research in the industry shows that education is becoming one of the profound industries these days. In near future higher education will become costlier. Because of these reasons lower class families' children might not be able to get the university education even if he/she is admitted to the university program. If such policy of giving free education to students who can’t afford the tuition is introduced students will be more excited to study further. Otherwise poor people stops their study after higher secondary studies.
Another reason I consider to be the policy to be appropriate is that if students are admitted to the universities and if they are not able to pay the tuition fees they might get disappointed and leave the study. In this case bright students are not getting proper opportunity to make it to the university education, and the student who might be less appropriate than the poor student will get into the university program just because of the tuition fees. Take for example, Indian Institute of Management, in which tuition fees are so high that lower class (or even lower-middle class) families won't be able to afford the tuition fees. So, the poor students who are admitted to the university, but don't have enough money to pay for the program will not be able to attend the program and instead more rich student who might not be that appropriate will get into the university program.
Like every coin has two side this policy might also have some bad impacts on the society. Whenever money are involved, there may be chances of corruption with government authorities. In this case the fund which is given for the policy might be misused. Also, if free education is given there is a chance that the student who is getting free education might not take study seriously, just because he/she is studying for free.
All in all, considering all the factors affecting the policy results I partially agree with the given policy off providing free education to students who can't afford the education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... will be more excited to study further. Otherwise poor people stops their study after hig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...who are admitted to the university, but dont have enough money to pay for the progra...
^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...roviding free education to students who cant afford the education.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253493013972 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.165668662675 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0818363273453 0.0880659088768 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.063872255489 0.0497285424764 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0179640718563 0.0444667217837 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0938123752495 0.12292977631 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0439121756487 0.0406280797675 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7165175117 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0339321357285 0.030933414821 110% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101796407186 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0339321357285 0.0249443105267 136% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0239520958084 0.0148568991511 161% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2708.0 2732.02544248 99% => OK
No of words: 447.0 452.878318584 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0581655481 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351230425056 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279642058166 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208053691275 0.200843997647 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13870246085 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7165175117 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 219.290929204 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41610738255 0.48968727796 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.4564704081 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2857142857 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9189727279 59.4972553346 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.952380952 141.124799967 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.380952380952 0.674092028746 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 49.2499201023 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.58064516129 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453688543263 0.391690518653 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116555369822 0.123202303941 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0949929205363 0.077325440228 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.521892078886 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.202595475876 0.149214159877 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17073880841 0.161403998019 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127843887889 0.0892212321368 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.37487673754 0.385218514788 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0963367701096 0.0692045440612 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307499858404 0.275328986314 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696044269863 0.0653680567796 106% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.