It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
There is a significant importance in the feedback we get from society, and it has been known since the ancient times that human beings are “social” creatures. However, to say the way we define ourself is mostly done from our interactions with social group is to go a little too far. The way we define ourselves is so complex that any claim about it should be careful and not absolute.
First, “let us make everything as simple as possible but not any simpler,” as Albert Einstein portrayed a successful scientific endeavor. Unfortunately, our self-image is a controversial subject, and was so always and even more after Sigmund Freud came up with his revolution theory of psycho-analysis. It is still unknown today how we define ourselves and what are the ingredients that take place in such a process. Sure, we are social, from our interactions that occur regularly, we learn, and develop. Nevertheless, there is no proof that those social interactions are the primary shaper of our identity.
Additionally, there is on going philosophical debate about what is real. How can one be assured that things external to him or her even exist? the external world is always suspicious of being imaginary and unreal. In that since, it is debatable whether or not such an external factor even have any influence at all. So, if the externalities do not exist in reality, from the pure logical perspective it does not exist at all and therefore cannot be the main arena for the process of self definition.
Taking a leap to other side of the coin, the argument could have been strengthen by making some corrections and adding limits to its main line. If the claim was that social interaction affect our own image with out attempting to quantify this effect, it would have been much more plausible. Without doing this modification the claim is dubious and unlikely to hold under serious examination.
Finally, there is a notion of vague language that is going on that prevents from the original statement the possibility of being accurate and lucid. It is not clear what is meant by “identification with social group”. It is unclear which social group are this process is aiming to point for. Social group can be anywhere from two individuals to millions and even billions of people.
To conclude, even though the claim is going too far there is an interaction between social environment and the individual. There is an old Chinese proverb that raise a similar point about a falling tree in a middle of forest with no witnesses. But, to go for one sided answer on such an arcane issue would not be an analytical discerning step. There should be some progress in science before we can take such statements with a sound ground below us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...s simple as possible but not any simpler,' as Albert Einstein portrayed a success...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...our identity. Additionally, there is on going philosophical debate about what is real...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ings external to him or her even exist? the external world is always suspicious of ...
^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... unreal. In that since, it is debatable whether or not such an external factor even have any i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
... the coin, the argument could have been strengthen by making some corrections and adding l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...social interaction affect our own image with out attempting to quantify this effect, it ...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.184557438795 0.240241500013 77% => OK
Verbs: 0.165725047081 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103578154426 0.0880659088768 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0677966101695 0.0497285424764 136% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0546139359699 0.0444667217837 123% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111111111111 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0376647834275 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95634465202 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0207156308851 0.030933414821 67% => OK
Particles: 0.00376647834275 0.0016655270985 226% => OK
Determiners: 0.0941619585687 0.0997080785238 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0169491525424 0.0249443105267 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0188323917137 0.0148568991511 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2766.0 2732.02544248 101% => OK
No of words: 468.0 452.878318584 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91025641026 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320512820513 0.366273622748 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.226495726496 0.280924506359 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17094017094 0.200843997647 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119658119658 0.132149295362 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95634465202 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 219.290929204 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540598290598 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 64.486883621 55.4138127331 116% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5563347224 59.4972553346 55% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.416666666667 0.674092028746 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 42.1495726496 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.1568627451 1.64882698954 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359188500659 0.391690518653 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103751076321 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0578699454165 0.077325440228 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494090518394 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0967564478421 0.149214159877 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12402856953 0.161403998019 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599107922715 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.273978927374 0.385218514788 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0596198082051 0.0692045440612 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225253669557 0.275328986314 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368515744447 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.