Technology does not hinder the critical thinking ability of human beings but provides new challenges for humans to solve. It poses mankind with new issues to resolve, meanwhile helping us to live a better life.
Technology has brought people closer. Now scientists located thousands of miles apart can collectively work on challenges of the future and discover new solutions. Technology has reduced the amount of time it is required to communicate information from one corner of the world to another, so that key decisions could be taken quickly. The usefulness of this technological advancement can be very much seen in Stock Exchanges where every minute is important.
Every advancement elicits a new challenge which again needs great minds to think of new solutions. As we improved our means of travel by making time taken to cover distances lesser, the pollution caused due to burning of fuel aroused. Once again thinkers around the work have put their thinking caps to deal with this issue.
The author may argue that with the invention of mobile phones, people less likely tend to remember phone numbers as compared to earlier. However we should not forget that these technological improvements has reduced the amount of energy needed to invest in petty tasks like remembering numbers or auditing medical records. The time saved from such tasks can now be fruitfully invested in much important tasks like examining patient’s records and curing him from his ailment. Also we must not forget that in the end the expertise of doctor would be required to study the x-ray.
Thus With new technological advancements and growing economy, the need for critical thinkers will not diminish. With every new technological improvement, a need to better it will always arise and that will lead to another technology breakthrough. Hence this is a never ending circle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... caused due to burning of fuel aroused. Once again thinkers around the work have put...
^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...r phone numbers as compared to earlier. However we should not forget that these technol...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ecords and curing him from his ailment. Also we must not forget that in the end the ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ould be required to study the x-ray. Thus With new technological advancements and...
^^^^
Line 9, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ead to another technology breakthrough. Hence this is a never ending circle.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234042553191 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.185410334347 0.157235817809 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0911854103343 0.0880659088768 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0699088145897 0.0497285424764 141% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0334346504559 0.0444667217837 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115501519757 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0699088145897 0.0406280797675 172% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78620968616 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0455927051672 0.030933414821 147% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0881458966565 0.0997080785238 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0334346504559 0.0249443105267 134% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00607902735562 0.0148568991511 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1874.0 2732.02544248 69% => OK
No of words: 303.0 452.878318584 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18481848185 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379537953795 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270627062706 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.204620462046 0.200843997647 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128712871287 0.132149295362 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78620968616 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.48968727796 125% => OK
Word variations: 68.9874105094 55.4138127331 124% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9375 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4570573535 59.4972553346 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.674092028746 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 46.0002062706 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.45263157895 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403234209241 0.391690518653 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0876907449388 0.123202303941 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0760047939784 0.077325440228 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.545005684869 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14326240127 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147078269909 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734109150635 0.0892212321368 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.212853881638 0.385218514788 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0465503265117 0.0692045440612 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246865975841 0.275328986314 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187140071167 0.0653680567796 29% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.