People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

In a world filled with a plethora of possibilities, an average human human being is subjected to choose among choices everyday. Ranging from what to eat, what to wear to what job to choose or whom to marry. In real life, decisions are not mathematical deductions. Certain conclusions are drawn based on human emotions at a particular point of time. However, a decision which is based on emotion and is later justified with logic, is a poor decision. A person who follows this methodology will fail in the long run.

First of all, a normal human being has two sides of a brain - the left brain that takes care of logic and the right brain that is responsible for the sentiments that has the cunning ability to swindle him into bad decisions. Decision making is a critical skill that any person should have. Whether big or small, the decisions are obviously going to affect certain things in his life. It is therefore wise to take a decision based on logical reasoning rather than emotions of the right brain. For instance, consider Maria who is married to John. They had a huge turmoil in the recent past due to John's frequent indulgence in lottery. At the end of the diatribe, Maria chose to divorce John as she was infuriated by his habits. Here, her right brain overpowered her left brain and hence she made the decision. If we analyse this deeply, it was an argument that lead to anger, which in turn, led to a bad decision. Just because John had a profligate nature doesn't mean he is a bad person. After all, they were married for a reason. Maria didn't deliberate over the amazing life she has with him and anger blinded her logic. Later, even if she justifies this decision by stating that John squanders wealth, it is still a poor decision to take at that point of time. She should have waited for a year or so, observe, think and then arrived at a decision instead of later trying to subterfuge a whimsical decision.

Secondly, forcing a logic on a precipitous decision is totally wrong and inherently illogical. This is because, it is blatantly a failure method. Let us illustrate this claim with the following case. Consider Alice and Diana who are best friends since high school. Alice is the topper while Diana is an average student. They both are neighbors too. Both of them wanted to pursue graduation in medicine. They took the required examinations where the Alice scored much higher than Diana. As a result, she got admits from the top med schools of the country while Diana got admitted into the state's med school that ranks below top 20. Alice, being highly emotional, decided to go with Diana to her school. Later, she justified it by stating that she didn't want the pressure of studying somewhere outside her state. Here, as we could observe, Alice is being totally illogical with her justification. Had she thought of this before, she wouldn't even have applied to the top schools. She took an emotional decision and tried to mask it with some irrational logic. This is going to affect her career in huge ways.

Finally, decision making is the process of analyzing all the possible alternatives or course of actions and deciding to choose the best one among them. If such a process is subjected to emotional bias, chances are high that the results will be poor and unjust as well. For example, consider Thomas who is the judge of the state court. One fine day, there was a case of robbery in the city and the robber was brought to be charged. This robber was Thomas's nephew. What is the best decision here? Thomas should choose to go with the law and penalize his nephew, who is a miscreant, without considering the familial values. On the other hand, if Thomas, being the highest authority of the state, chose to find some loophole and save his nephew from the case with very less or no punishment, it is unethical in the face of law. This is actually one of the major reasons why family is not allowed in a law or medical situation. In such cases, logically justifying an unjust emotional decision is ignoble.

Thus, we can conclude that any decision should be based on analysis, deliberations and facts, rather than emotions. An emotional decision should not be immediately put into action as it would lead to unfruitful, or even disastrous results. Such decisions should still be analyzed with logic and then finalized. Emotions should lie dormant when logic speaks!

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: human
...a plethora of possibilities, an average human human being is subjected to choose among choi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ng is subjected to choose among choices everyday. Ranging from what to eat, what to wear...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hodology will fail in the long run. First of all, a normal human being has t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 960, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...st because John had a profligate nature doesnt mean he is a bad person. After all, the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1041, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
..., they were married for a reason. Maria didnt deliberate over the amazing life she ha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to subterfuge a whimsical decision. Secondly, forcing a logic on a precipito...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...untry while Diana got admitted into the states med school that ranks below top 20. Ali...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 752, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...r, she justified it by stating that she didnt want the pressure of studying somewhere...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 937, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...on. Had she thought of this before, she wouldnt even have applied to the top schools. S...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to affect her career in huge ways. Finally, decision making is the process ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...njust emotional decision is ignoble. Thus, we can conclude that any decision ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 48.0 19.5258426966 246% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => OK
Preposition: 101.0 58.6224719101 172% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3630.0 2235.4752809 162% => OK
No of words: 772.0 442.535393258 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70207253886 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.27113725669 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51142230451 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 366.0 215.323595506 170% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474093264249 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1147.5 704.065955056 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 49.0 20.2370786517 242% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9535965742 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0816326531 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7551020408 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24489795918 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.83258426966 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260359122693 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062600153548 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735884591641 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162683611476 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383593372243 0.0667264976115 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.1639044944 80% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.