Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su

Essay topics:

Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The utility of scandals in drawing the attention of masses towards problems over the role of reformers in achieving the same is highly debatable. The issue presents two different opinions for the same. However, if we see a larger picture, the role of scandals in diverting the focus on problems is far fetched, while the relevance of reformers appear more plausible.

Scandals are issues which have more of a negative connotation , which impies that they should never serve as de-facto standards for gathering the opinion of the community. Scandals are eye-catching, in fact mostly lurid, which mea...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (6 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hich have more of a negative connotation , which impies that they should never ser...
^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...is practice abolished. Although one cant deny that what is brought about by refo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...fleeting attention that a scandal draws cant and rather should not be compared with ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ntensity of the issue been any less, it wouldnt have been termed as scandal in the firs...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 906, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...reful next time to avoid getting caught in future. It might have brought some tax evaders...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1001, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: was
...nd their ways, but for most of them, it was was a premonition to be more careful in the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1005, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...heir ways, but for most of them, it was was a premonition to be more careful in the...
^^^
Line 9, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to bringing an evolution for the better, of the exisiting problems. What a reform...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, in fact, in general, no doubt, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2596.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93536121673 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57149566805 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51711026616 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9397069343 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.869565217 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8695652174 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198160337313 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577799170925 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417786458211 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114330707175 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129499766577 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.