Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
The author of the statement claims that one of the striking responsibility of the community is corresponds to patronage special ingenious students through superb education. While others believe that this decision is not evenhanded due to variety reasons. I agree with this claims. Consider the both views and what follows my point would be delineated.
To begin with, we all know that there is a considerable number of children who they are highly destitution, whereas, their talent is extraordinary. Provided that government take a tremendous amount of heed to this children definitely it would be worthwhile due to they become a precious investment for a protracted long.
Inasmuch as, some students are a diamonds conceal in mine, hence investing and allocating a plethora for boosting their ability would be beneficial and remarkable without a shadow of doubt.
Furthermore, as a matter of fact that as long as expert allotting an excessive amount of time and energy and budget for training just smart student would lead to adverse other student. Indeed, we ought to take attention to all student, there is not any disparate among student. In fact, discriminating intelligence students with other student who they have a modicum amount of perspicacious is undoubtedly unfair. One of the striking example for this issue is pertaining to my childhood period. When my teachers taking a plethora time and attention to smart students in the class , this lead to a detrimental effect the other student without a shadow of doubt.
Notwithstanding, wasting their talent owing to lack of money and devoid of great training is a improper impact on their personality. As a consequence, society should determine children who have a particular capability and provide facility for them at an early age.
By taking into account, investing on the talent children would have a remarkable advantage in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ious students through superb education. While others believe that this decision is no...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ed due to variety reasons. I agree with this claims. Consider the both views and wha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ent take a tremendous amount of heed to this children definitely it would be worthwh...
^^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a diamond' or simply 'diamonds'?
Suggestion: a diamond; diamonds
...d long. Inasmuch as, some students are a diamonds conceal in mine, hence investing and al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 581, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...attention to smart students in the class , this lead to a detrimental effect the o...
^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f money and devoid of great training is a improper impact on their personality. A...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, so, whereas, while, in fact, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 306.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2614379085 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03392874958 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7171155883 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239023488218 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793987440872 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118027551771 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141723200213 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150361425285 0.0667264976115 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.