Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art is the portrait of a country's cultural heritage. To understand art, one requires to have a creative bend of mind. In this IT backed modern world where people are fully engrossed in electronic gadgets, there is hardly any time for artistic activities. Let alone the idea of pursuing a career in the field of arts, it is in fact inching closer to become obsolete. Being an avid admirer of art in any form, I will place myself in the first category of people who think government funds are necessary for arts to flourish and be available to all people.
With the evolution of new technologies, art has also modernized to some extent. Theaters have come up where live plays are enacted. Somehow, art has not been able to cope up with the development that other sectors have seen. Art has never been a necessity of people. In fact, a relatively smaller chunk of folks show interest in arts. Museum goers can be counted on fingers when compared to movie buffs. Looking at the plight of artists, students hardly consider making their career in the field of arts. This is where government needs to come in picture. Students should be encouraged to pursue arts as their profession by giving scholarships to the deserved candidates. Government should fund as well as organize exhibitions to attract artists and the audience. The exhibitions should invite artists not only from other states, but from other countries too. Artists need to be paid a handsome amount for their intricate work.
Indigenous art has always been at the back seat. Native artists rarely get recognized for their aesthetic work. This form of art mainly goes unnoticed due to lack of publicity. Government can publicize the work of indigenous artists by displaying it at public places like bus stations and railway platforms. This will not only prove economical, but will be very helpful in getting mass attention. Apart from it, outlets can be constructed to have a medium for the sale of artistic things.
As every coin has two sides, the government funding can pose threat to the integrity of arts. Since money will get involved if government comes at the aid of arts, it his highly probable that unskillful people will try to make the most of this situation. Forgery and piracy may thrive, as some antisocial elements will try to sell duplicate items. Instead of protecting arts, government might end up in causing irreparable damage to the country' cultural heritage.
On a conclusive note, I would say government interference is unavoidable to help arts flourish. At the same time, it is government's responsibility to have a check on the authenticity of artists' works. In an attempt to save the cultural heritage, a permanent damage should not be inflicted on a country's identity.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'apart from', 'in fact', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256310679612 0.240241500013 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.172815533981 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0873786407767 0.0880659088768 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0446601941748 0.0497285424764 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0252427184466 0.0444667217837 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122330097087 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.052427184466 0.0406280797675 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73988538525 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0427184466019 0.030933414821 138% => OK
Particles: 0.00582524271845 0.0016655270985 350% => OK
Determiners: 0.0893203883495 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0330097087379 0.0249443105267 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00970873786408 0.0148568991511 65% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2760.0 2732.02544248 101% => OK
No of words: 467.0 452.878318584 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91006423983 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.346895074946 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263383297645 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199143468951 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132762312634 0.132149295362 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73988538525 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 219.290929204 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552462526767 0.48968727796 113% => OK
Word variations: 66.6917815994 55.4138127331 120% => OK
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6194690265 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.5666666667 23.380412469 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1678559251 59.4972553346 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 141.124799967 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5666666667 23.380412469 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 41.9049964311 51.4728631049 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.776 1.64882698954 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533918715918 0.391690518653 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0708080656773 0.123202303941 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0644667256216 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.420377607349 0.547984918172 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139945289658 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161087385681 0.161403998019 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112291625808 0.0892212321368 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.352983795174 0.385218514788 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0578606473624 0.0692045440612 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358807174759 0.275328986314 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936988263237 0.0653680567796 143% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88274336283 287% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.70907079646 295% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.