Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more influence on children's behavior.
Children are often compared to a blank sheet of clear white paper on which anything for the first time, written stays permanent, or they are compared to a growing sapling. The sapling grows in the way in which it is allowed to grow. If a bent sapling isn't corrected by a stiff stick, the sapling grows into a bent tree, the metaphor meaning a bad person.
It is not false that media nowadays does contain more violent content than it did few decades ago and its also not fully wrong to think that this violence may be the driving force behind increased violence in our society, especially among children. To think about it, there are millions who grow up in places which are so impoverished that access to digital technology is simply out of the question. I believe that the major influential force on the behavior of the society is the quality and the environment of upbringing.
Speaking of poor localities, there are many places in the world where slums are present and its observed that people living here lack common manners and tend towards a more rustic and brash behavior. Petty quarrels have been extant and are sometimes dragged to an extent where people have been known to destroy goods hand-carts of their "arch nemesis" - basically it comes down to destroying property. Children who live there, imbibe all these from their parents and see it happening and feel, that this is the right way to tackle a such a problem, i.e., being violent and destructive. There are viral videos spreading on social networks which consists of young African boys running around in their slum with pistols and together they shoot a helpless victim - even after he is killed. This is the level of violence that prevails in some societies where it seems that bad influence remains unchecked.
Not forgetting the people growing up in wealthy environments; as mentioned earlier, behavior of the society depends on the quality and the environment of upbringing. Even among the rich people, the youngsters have easy access to illegal items such as drugs and weapons, and cars. Cars aren't illegal but they're a potential killing machine. With added horsepower and an equally powerful adrenaline rush, youngsters drive rashly and lots of hit and run cases are reported.
In conclusion, I would say that the major influential force in the behavior of the society is the society itself, especially the older generations, rather than violent media. Violent media does promote violence in the society but not to an extent which the environment of a particular locality could.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...t is allowed to grow. If a bent sapling isnt corrected by a stiff stick, the sapling...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity and the environment of upbringing. Speaking of poor localities, there are m...
^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rrels have been extant and are sometimes dragged to an extent where people have b...
^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ch as drugs and weapons, and cars. Cars arent illegal but theyre a potential killing ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...apons, and cars. Cars arent illegal but theyre a potential killing machine. With added...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hit seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of hits'.
Suggestion: lots of hits
...aline rush, youngsters drive rashly and lots of hit and run cases are reported. In conc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'speaking of', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22268907563 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.161764705882 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107142857143 0.0880659088768 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0588235294118 0.0497285424764 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0399159663866 0.0444667217837 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111344537815 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0504201680672 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58796382398 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0252100840336 0.030933414821 81% => OK
Particles: 0.00420168067227 0.0016655270985 252% => OK
Determiners: 0.100840336134 0.0997080785238 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0063025210084 0.0249443105267 25% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0231092436975 0.0148568991511 156% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2575.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 434.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9331797235 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341013824885 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276497695853 0.280924506359 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.170506912442 0.200843997647 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0990783410138 0.132149295362 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58796382398 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 219.290929204 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559907834101 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 66.58165228 55.4138127331 120% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 25.5294117647 23.380412469 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9432203559 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.470588235 141.124799967 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5294117647 23.380412469 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.529411764706 0.674092028746 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 53.17918135 51.4728631049 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.47580645161 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424818209797 0.391690518653 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113000817403 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0751736649024 0.077325440228 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.570203206449 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143927021279 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159422846477 0.161403998019 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856991523256 0.0892212321368 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.341152153176 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0317545407884 0.0692045440612 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267931583605 0.275328986314 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760679038928 0.0653680567796 116% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.