The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data, or events and see different things.
I completely agree that the way we look at any objects, facts, or events it depends on personalities. Education or training given for all the same will be same but the way the interpret the things will be different. The personalities is all about moral education they received from their parents and the environment were they grew up also matters to see things differently or to interpret differently.
For example the education given in the university will be same for all the students who is pursing the business studies. Based on the education and also because of there personality few will take risk and become entrepreneur and others end up working for money. After graduating everyone received same education but they will end up in different fields its because of the personalities and how they interpret.
Sometimes personality of person play a major role on how we handle problems. The optimist person takes every problem in positive way and try to find the solution but the pessimist person thinks he cannot solve and he will never try to solve the problem. Hence, he will never succeed he will end blaming himself for his failure and also be blames god that he is not blessed like others because he is not successfully. Therefore, if a person having profound knowledge like others but he cannot use it because if his interpretation are always negative.
One more example where personality has upper hand in viewing things or object differently, for few music is the tranquillity they find peace in there stressful life but for others its just a loud music. Also few do not give importance to art they think its waste of time but for others its creativity where they find there soul.
In conclusion, personality is the main reason for viewing things differently even with same education provided. Its all about the who they are deep inside in their heart will come based on the things they see and interpret differently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...r all the same will be same but the way the interpret the things will be different. The perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...gs will be different. The personalities is all about moral education they received...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ut they will end up in different fields its because of the personalities and how th...
^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, if a person having profound knowledge like others but he cannot use it because...
^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun music seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little music'.
Suggestion: little music
...ewing things or object differently, for few music is the tranquillity they find peace in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e but for others its just a loud music. Also few do not give importance to art they ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ntly even with same education provided. Its all about the who they are deep inside ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, all the same
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89393939394 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75047537422 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487878787879 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4843856392 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265110167425 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107215125855 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688015258462 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167063515504 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805381745409 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.