The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph demonstrates the number of consuming fish, lamb, beef, and chicken in Europe for six periods.

This chart shows that number of beef consumption decline from 230 to 110 grams in 1979 until 2004. However, at 1983, beef rise dramatically which almost reach the number of 250 grams and stable for five years. Moreover, the lamb also has the same trend number with beef that always down. The first number of consumption lamb in 1979 is 150 grams and slightly decrease every year which just 60 grams in the last periods.

In contrast, the number of people who consume chicken increase...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (9 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: It is contradict with chicken which never fall and fish which stay in same number since first year.
Description: The token is is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to is and contradict

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 9
No. of Words: 195 200
No. of Characters: 892 900
No. of Different Words: 93 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.737 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.574 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.193 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 28 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.233 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.505 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.698 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.172 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4