The graph below shows the four leading types of farming produce in Mitchford city between 1970 2000 Summarize the following information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the four leading types of farming produce in Mitchford city between 1970-2000.
Summarize the following information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

19970-2000 years’ data regarding the production of four leading farming in Mitchford city is illustrated in the chart. Overall, the rates of wheat, corn and cotton were the same in 1970 and 2000.

In the beginning of period profit of wheat was approximately two times higher than cotton, 20 and 45 thousand dollars respectively. Then later, until 1982 cotton production remained the same, however after that it is picked so significantly that reached 90 thousand dollars in 1995. In production of corn there were also increase till 1985 and then it started to decrease and it showed 30 thousand dollars in 2000.

Even though there were difference for 20 thousand dollars in 1970’s in farming spheres like wheat and sugar, their production profit became almost the same by the end of the time. In about 1985’s three production: cotton, sugar and corn illustrated the same and it were approximately 36 thousand.

In short, though there was a very important increase in production of cotton till 1995, it went down so significantly and reached lowest point of that it had in 1970, 20 thousand dollars.

Votes
Average: 4.6 (8 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

profit of wheat was approximately two times higher than cotton
profit of wheat was approximately two times higher than that of cotton

Even though there were difference for 20 thousand dollars in 1970’s in farming spheres like wheat and sugar, their production profit became almost the same by the end of the time.
Suggestion: Can you re-write this sentence?

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 184 200
No. of Characters: 892 1000
No. of Different Words: 94 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.683 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.848 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.672 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.958 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.49 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.732 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.127 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4