İncreasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective?

Essay topics:

İncreasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective?

Traffic and pollution are the main problem in some countries in modern society. Some people claim that the best method to solve traffic and pollution hardships is grow the cost of petroleum. There is no doubt that it will not solve difficulties and on the contemporary will lead to some problems such as non-oil countries will depend on petroleum countries, the price of goods will increase and it will bring unfairness to society.

To begin with,there are many ways to deal with traffic and pollution. Increasing the price of petrol is not good concept since non-oil countries will depend on petroleum states.In this case, condition of the country will worsen and and they will need more money to purchase petroleum. Thats why it will increase the worth of goods such as foods,houses and other things. Moreover, rich people will be able to buy petrol and it will bring unfairness to society since poor people will not have enough money to gain petrol. For instance, the price of public transport also will grow and it will bring an opinion to society that if you are poor you can travel by bicycle or on your foot.

In the second stage,there are some measures which can be effective. Maintaining and broadening old ways might be helpful. Furthermore, building new modern ways and bridges can reduce a number of traffic. On the other hand, goverment should encourage people to healthy life for example, travelling by bicycle and walking since it will decrease pollution.

In conclusion, increasing the worth of petrol is not a good way to solve growing traffic and pollution since it will lead to certain problems in modern society.In my opinion states should think regarding alternative modes to handle these problems.

Votes
Average: 7 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: Traffic and pollution are the main problem in some countries in modern society.
Description: The fragment the main problem is not usually preceded by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is

Sentence: Some people claim that the best method to solve traffic and pollution hardships is grow the cost of petroleum.
Description: The token is is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to is and grow

Sentence: Increasing the price of petrol is not good concept since non-oil countries will depend on petroleum states.In this case, condition of the country will worsen and and they will need more money to purchase petroleum.
Description: The token and is not usually followed by a conjunction, coordinating
Suggestion: Refer to and and and

Sentence: On the other hand, goverment should encourage people to healthy life for example, travelling by bicycle and walking since it will decrease pollution.
Error: goverment Suggestion: government

flaws:
No. of Different Words: 144 200

'On the other hand' means However. It doesn't mean 'On another hand'.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 294 350
No. of Characters: 1402 1500
No. of Different Words: 144 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.141 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.769 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.406 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 97 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.174 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.36 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.562 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.082 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5