4 differend kinds of meat consumption in European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph shows the consumption of fish, chicken lamb and beef among European people over a period of twenty five years between 1979 and 2004.
In 1979, beef was by far the most popular of these foods, with abput 225 grams per person per week, while lamb and chicken were eaten about as much as each other. However, by 1982, the gap in comsumption between these two kinds of meat had widened and considerably more people prefered chicken meat than lamb meat. Meanwhile fish meat was consumed much less (just over 50 grams).
As can be seen from the graph the fish was consumed 50-60 grams per person per week over the all twenty five years. The beef consumption was fluctuating from 1979 till 1982, and finally, beef consumers became less, about 100 grams per person per week in 2004. Chicken meat consumption was rapidly increased from 140 grams in 1979 to 260 grams in 2004, while the lamb was consumed less and went down to 60 grams by 2004.
However, during this 25 year period, the fish consumption almost remained at same quantity (about 60 grams), with all three kinds of meat were eaten much more.
the fish consumption almost remained at same quantity
the fish consumption almost remained at the same quantity
with all three kinds of meat were eaten much more.
while all three kinds of meat were eaten much more.
Sentence: As can be seen from the graph the fish was consumed 50-60 grams per person per week over the all twenty five years.
Description: The token the is not usually followed by a determiner/pronoun, pre-quantifier
Suggestion: Refer to the and all
Sentence: In 1979, beef was by far the most popular of these foods, with abput 225 grams per person per week, while lamb and chicken were eaten about as much as each other.
Error: abput Suggestion: about
Sentence: However, by 1982, the gap in comsumption between these two kinds of meat had widened and considerably more people prefered chicken meat than lamb meat.
Error: comsumption Suggestion: consumption
Error: prefered Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 197 200
No. of Characters: 881 1000
No. of Different Words: 97 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.746 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.472 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.054 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 41 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 29 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.894 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.509 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.741 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.185 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4