The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The line graph illustrates the amount of energy consumed in the USA from 1980 to the 2030 projections.
Generally, there are six distinguish types of energy used in America between the reported period.
In 1980, 35 quadrillion units of petrol and oil were used by the American. The amount dropped to just over 30 quadrillion units in the next five years. After that, the figure increased dramatically, by 2005, there was 40 quadrillion units of petrol and oil was consumed. It is predicted that, the figure will continue to rise significantly until 2030.
The utilization of coal and natural gas also grew between 1980 and 2015. However, while the amount of natural gas is forecasted to remain unchanged in the preceded 15 years, such amount of coal is suggested to be increased to nearly 30 quadrillion units.
Both the use of nuclear power and solar or wind power in America experienced a small increase, from about 4 quadrillion units in 1980 to over 5 quadrillion units, and approximately 5 quadrillion units in 2010, respectively. The amounts are predicted to grow slightly to 2030. The consumption of hydropower, on the contrary, fluctuated through the period of 25 years with around 4 quadrillion units.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01485148515 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97254452924 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559405940594 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0919191815 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0909090909 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160610153482 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679663077678 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759988868566 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109529634999 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931814380495 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.