The graph gives information about how much American and Britain drivers spent on petrol, dividing them for the different levels of income.
For what concerns the category of the poorest, it is possible to notice that they followed a positive upward trend spending almost the 3% of their income on petrol, while in the USA, although at the beginning they were increasing reaching a pick of more than 5%, then instead they started to decrease the consume keeping a downward tendency all over the 2 categories left: middle-income and richest.
In fact, for the first category the fall reached a percentage of almost 4 that dramatically and constantly continued to decrease until the second category of the richest that spent on petrol less than 3%.
Whereas UK, interweaved with USA for the middle-income reaching the same percentage (4)in the consume of petrol and then remained constant until a final small drop not very significant for the richest drivers.
Sentence: Whereas UK, interweaved with USA for the middle-income reaching the same percentage 4in the consume of petrol and then remained constant until a final small drop not very significant for the richest drivers.
Error: interweaved Suggestion: interleaved ?
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.5 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 779 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.93 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.733 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 59 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.183 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.584 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.138 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4