The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.
The line graph illustrates, the population of four different kinds of turtles in 22years from 1980 to 2012 in India. Unit is measured in index.
Overall, it can be seen that the Olive Ridely Turtles have experienced an upward trend while Leatherback Turtles saw an opposite trend for the whole period. Green Turtles and All species have showed a fluctuation in the figures of index.
The amount of Olive Ridely Turtles started at just 100 in 1980. This figure accelerated which was over 135 in 1997 but in the end of the time 2012 this figure was dropped back up to 130. In 1980, Leatherback Turtles started with the similar figure as Olive Ridely Turtles which remained stable till 1984 but it slowly inclined to approximately 112 in 1987 after this it fall down to almost 55 in 2010 and it remained constant till 2012.
Green Turtles and all species of turtles remained approximately the same until 1992 by the following years all species of turtles have left behind the Green turtles till the end of juncture which was 20.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'falls'?
Suggestion: falls
...approximately 112 in 1987 after this it fall down to almost 55 in 2010 and it remain...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72777777778 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4414817905 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0587385854 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293590217743 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133191729763 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108943374621 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186619221723 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941454023253 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.