The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category 2002

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category - 2002

The provided table illustrates the proportion of national payments in Ireland, Spain, Italy, Sweden and Turkey on three differents products and services in 2002.
At the first glane, all countries spent most on food, drink and tobaco, while the lowest consumption was on leisure and education in the five countries. Overall, the expenditure of Turkey was higher than the other countries.
Food, drink and tobacco consumption in Turkey, which took the highest prossesion of the five countries, at 31,14%. The expenditure of Ireland was also high (at 28,91%) compared to Sweden which spent least on these terms of products is 15,77%. Spain and Italy consumed 18,80% and 16,36% respectively.
In terms of clothing and footwear, Italy spent more than the other countries (9,00 %) in contrast to the lowest figure which could be observed in Sweden at 5,40%. Whereas, the other countries spent on average approximately 6,5%.
All the five countries spent least on leisures and education accounted for under 5%. Turkey spents most on services at just 4,35% of their national consumption which is around doubled that of Spain (1,98%).

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided table illustrates the propo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
...ximately 6,5%. All the five countries spent least on leisures and education accounted for...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64647227689 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8419079857 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139165203874 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573022856833 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464858125201 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829742456984 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523989677258 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.