the chart below show the percentage of male and female students getting top grades in 1960 and 2000. Summarise and information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
The given column charts compare the rate of different gender students who achieved top marks in 1960 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen from graph that percentage of top scorers in different subject by girls were decrease moderately while this ratios were fluctuated for males; except only for Language for boys and maths for females remained unchanged.
In 1960, approximately 30 per cent males scored good grade in science and maths, whereas in language and humanities accounted for just above a fifth. Only one in ten scored high in arts. In contrast, girls did much better in language and humanities and arts, which made up 45%, around a third and 30% scoring high in these subject respectively. Only 10% girls succeed in science and the least scored high in maths, at 5% merely.
In 2000, among boys, the percentage of top scorers in arts and humanities almost double whereas in science and maths became approximately half as compare to the figure of 1960. The number of girls who got good scorers after 40 years in arts, language and humanities were a significant decreased, which constituted a little more than 30% for languages and approximately a quarter for arts and humanities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...by girls were decrease moderately while this ratios were fluctuated for males; excep...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely a quarter for arts and humanities.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97014925373 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64670070618 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0072111385 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101839509103 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510169426999 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597288527621 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078480199769 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527779308331 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.