The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts compare various types of energy in terms of production in France in two years 1995 and 2005.
It is clear that the percentage of Coal being produced was highest in both years. By contrast, the figure for Other types of energy was by far lowest.
In 1995, Coal’s production accounted for the highest proportion, at 29.80% of the total energy production in France. The rates of Gas and Petro produced were slightly lower, at 29.63% and 29.27% respectively. Meanwhile, only 6.40% of the total production belonged to Nuclear energy.
In 2005, the percentage of Coal produced insignificantly went up and remained the highest figure in the chart, at 30.93%. The figure for Gas rose slowly to 30.31%, while Petro’s production experienced a dramatic fall of nearly 10% to only 19.55%. There were sharp increases in the figures for Nuclear and Other types of energy to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08552631579 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80623532824 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559210526316 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4326392377 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8888888889 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192475937043 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872473841913 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101741796012 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14417904109 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11597088168 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.